Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louise de Marillac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change article titles or infoboxes after concerns about doing so have been raised. If your bold edit is reverted then go to the talk page and discuss the edit. Only when consensus favors the edit should the edit then be made. DrKiernan (talk) 16:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

You have been told now by three editors to seek consensus! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are promoting false information and threatening me, Gerard von Hebel? Anjo-sozinho (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duarte Pio, Duke of Braganza. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Yopie (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

I give you notice that I will take this matter up with an administrator that was involved in earlier cases where you editions on Portuguese royalty articles were deemed disruptive. Seek consensus before adding contentious material! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 07:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 17:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 17:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.Coulds yous pleaes tells mes hows to change image? (Bistymings (talk) 06:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rádio e Televisão de Portugal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | style="background-color:#FFFFFF" align=center|[[File:RTP África 2016 (Reduced Version=.svg|92px]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 19:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Refrain from editing my talk. If we have correspondence it will be on article talk pages and admin boards. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, stop trying to pitch people against each other, it's sad (also playing with our face is not a phrase btw). Secondly, I support the use of the infobox/royalty and consensus came to use it on Duarte Pio's talk page months ago for his page and the other related miguelist dukes, so you are the only one who is acting against it, and thus disrupting the page's stability and going against community consensus. He has also not reverted any information of mine that was not in good faith (once again, stop trying to cause a fight, it's not respectable). You are the one "destroying consensus" on wiki. You need to learn that whatever your personal views are have no bearing onto wiki and its articles. No matter how fervently you may believe in Maria Pia or the Braganza-Coburgs, credible sources, community consensus, and abiding by Wiki's policies and rules will decide how and what material is presented in an article. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 22:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are acting as Hebel. I cannot accept that. You cannot tell that Duarte Pio and other Miguelist pretenders "reign" because that is false. You have any reference about "Kings Duartes" that never exists. If you don't accept treat Maria Pia's article with dignity, you cannot come to ask me to accept the lies published in Miguelist articles. Duarte Pio's wife is now the Royal Princess of Portugal? LOL. Even a person that doesn't know anything about History of Portugal knows that it is a giant foolish. I will not accept false information based in non-neutral points of view. I will appeal to adminsitration and to many other users to help me to resolve the false information that you and Hebel are publishing about this subject. I believed we were to build a consensus, but then I saw that even this is false. I'm really sorry that you had changed that, believe me. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Vatican City. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Charles (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vassula Ryden. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anjo-sozinho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anjo-sozinho, please avoid adding external links to commercial sites, non-official tourist sites or other only loosely related sites, that primarily promote organizations, products or services. Such links are generally discouraged (see WP:ELNO #4 and 5). Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 21:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this source does not seem to pass WP:RS. Please see Talk:Christ the King (Almada) article talk page. Thanks In ictu oculi (talk) 22:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Patrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Patrick's Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Christian pilgrimage. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dl2000, that was not my intention. I publish those external links because they are more related with the article. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 21:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Fátima Prayers have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Fátima, Portugal. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. GermanJoe (talk) 16:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello Anjo-sozinho, you have been repeatedly asked to stop adding external links to commercial travel and tourist sites. Also, links should contain directly relevant information about the article's topic itself, not to vaguely related separate topics or organizations. Wikipedia is not a link directory or a platform to promote local tourism or pilgrimages, and has clear guidelines about the restricted usage of external links. If you continue to add these links, these domains will get blacklisted. GermanJoe (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • Dear GermanJoe: the official websites "fatima.pt" and "peregrinosdefatima.pt" are directly related with Fátima (city) and the Sanctuary and the Marian apparitions, and considered by several Wikipedia members and several articles as official sources about this well-known subject. For that reason, they should be maintained (are not spam links) as it happens with the other worldwide famous Marian shrines and articles. Please, take this as a contribution and not as a vandalism. My purpose is offer a good articles to our community, not an advertising service to the shrine or other institutions. Thank you. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 14:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anjo-sozinho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is neither necessary nor encyclopedic to include every street in the article. Thank you! Disembodied Soul (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Anjo-sozinho, thanks for creating Caramujeira!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 11:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, just 17.37% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for January: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/64|Prisoners]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/65|Fashion designers]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/66|Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nazaré, Portugal into Praia do Norte (Nazaré). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anjo-sozinho, I see you have gone around and added links to Portugal to the articles for every song from Eurovision Song Contest 2018. This constitutes overlinking, because Portugal is a well-known country and we don't need to link to it per this guideline. You also linked several instances of it that I specifically delinked already. I suggest you either delink it on these articles yourself (because it is not particularly useful) or I will be happy to do it for you. Ss112 16:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to The Bahamas. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Donald Albury 00:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portuguese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monaco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fontvieille (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anjo-sozinho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anjo-sozinho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cova da Iria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Luxury

Fátima, Portugal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Quarter

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Portuguese Way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amália Rodrigues, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]