There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -AHampton (talk) 00:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

136.61.198.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Every edit by this user is mere vandalism, specifically (in quotes):

02:09, 19 November 2017 - Europa (moon) ‎ (→‎Surface features) "...lacking large-scale hole features such as Anus mountains and craters."

11:26, 18 November 2017 - Rosemary Kennedy ‎ (→‎Lobotomy: Clarification.) "Because of the procedure, her father now burns in hell for eternity."

08:23, 11 November 2017 - Proof (rapper) ‎ (→‎Death: Clarification.) "The police eventually decided to file the whole case away in their 'bunch of n!&&@$ with guns got shot,' file."

08:39, 9 November 2017 - Marissa Mayer ‎ (→‎Personal life: Clarification.) "Since then she's had 5 million other children."

06:46, 9 November 2017 - Marissa Mayer ‎ (→‎Personal life: Clarity) "She has since given birth to 5 million other children."

15:06, 16 August 2017 - Mike Bickle (minister) (→‎Ministry: Clarification.) "Bickle was fired" was edited to "resigned" without proof.

-AHampton (talk) 20:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kosack. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Marissa Mayer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Europa (moon) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Europa (moon) was changed by 136.61.198.171 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882878 on 2017-11-19T02:09:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Do You Know the Muffin Man? ‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rush (1991 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mormonism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paleozoic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pogue. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rhineland Bastard, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Diane Linkletter. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -INeedSupport- ^{(Time for Christmas!)} 00:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]