1. You will need to be an active editor. If you haven't been particularly active lately, preference may be given to another request.
2. You will need to have a confirmed email address, and be willing to provide this address to someone from the Foundation and to JSTOR (unlike Wikipedia, JSTOR access requires email). The Interior is the current contact.
3. You will need to sign up here, with access given out in the order of signups. Please sign up even if the 500 person limit has been reached, so that overall interest can be measured and we can get a waitlist started. Before you post a request, please check on this page to see whether you already have access through your local public library and/or educational institution.

• If you are given access but fail to register an account within a reasonable time, you may be asked to relinquish it to another requester.
• There is no minimum usage requirement, but if you're not really using your account and you're willing to give it to another person on the list, please let the Foundation contact know.
• You will need to abide by the JSTOR Terms of Service, and should be comfortable with the fine print in the JSTOR Privacy Policy.

• You do not have free online access to these JSTOR products through your local library or university
• You have your preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia or on your home wiki linked from your application; (see Special:Preferences)
• You have an account that is a minimum of six months old
• You have a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia
• You are active in content generation, research, and/or verification work

If you don't quite meet the experience requirements but think you would still be a strong candidate for access, feel free to apply and you may be considered.

Approved editors may

• Search, view, retrieve, and display portions of restricted content
• Electronically save portions of restricted content
• Print out single copies of portions of restricted content
• Comply with any terms and conditions which appear on the particular pages of the JSTOR website they are accessing

Approved editors will not

• Share their account logins or passwords with others
• Mass scrape or mass download JSTOR content
• Systematically make printed or electronic copies of multiple extracts of restricted content available for any purpose
• Datamine metadata without permission, in order, for instance, to use metadata for auto-created stub articles
• Use the access provided through the Pilot for any commercial purpose

Private and confidential information

• You will need to have a confirmed email address to participate. You understand and agree that your name and email address may be shared with representatives of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia Library, and JSTOR. While Wikipedia Library coordinators are volunteers (not employees or contractors of the Wikimedia Foundation or JSTOR), they have signed confidentiality agreements with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to the personal information they may handle for the Wikipedia Library.

• Editors should always provide original citation information, in addition to linking a JSTOR article, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT
• Editors should not provide bare links to non-free JSTOR pages
• Editors should credit JSTOR and denote the registration requirement by adding |registration=yes and |via=[[JSTOR]] parameters to {{cite}} or {{citation}} templates as appropriate, or by using the standalone template, {{Subscription required|via=[[JSTOR]]}}

Examples

Closed access articles

• <ref>{{cite journal |last=Ziff |first=David |title=Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant
|journal=[[Columbia Law Review]] |accessdate=14 April 2014 |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=841–872 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4099480
|date=April 2005 |registration=yes |via=[[JSTOR]] }}</ref>

• Ziff, David (April 2005). "Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant". Columbia Law Review. 105 (3): 841–872. Retrieved 14 April 2014 – via JSTOR. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |registration= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)

• <ref>{{cite journal |last=Ziff |first=David |title=Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant
|journal=[[Columbia Law Review]] |accessdate=14 April 2014 |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=841–872 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4099480
|date=April 2005 }}{{Subscription required |via=[[JSTOR]]}}</ref>

• Ziff, David (April 2005). "Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant". Columbia Law Review. 105 (3): 841–872. Retrieved 14 April 2014. – via JSTOR (subscription required)

Open Access article in JSTOR where OA template is helpful for readers

• <ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jerome|first1=Fred|title=Einstein, Race, and the Myth of the Cultural Icon|journal=Isis|date=December 2004|volume=95|issue=4|pages=627–639|accessdate=24 September 2015 |subscription=no|registration=no|via=[[JSTOR]]|doi=10.1086/430653|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/430653}} {{open access}}</ref>

• Jerome, Fred (December 2004). "Einstein, Race, and the Myth of the Cultural Icon". Isis. 95 (4): 627–639. doi:10.1086/430653.

NOTE We are currently reviewing approved but unused accounts, and trying to get these into the hands of new applicants. New approvals will be delayed until mid-September. Apologies for the delays. The Interior (Talk) 22:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Wikipedia:TWL/Expect # Add yourself to the bottom of this list with #{{user8|USERNAME|Project=code}} (e.g. {{user8|Example|Project=en}}), active areas on Wikipedia, and how you would use access to JSTOR.[reply]

1. Aspro (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active since 2006. I have a broad range of interests, so get frustrated at the number of times a google scholar search leads me to JSTOR and I can't read the whole paper to see if it makes a suitable WP reference. Too many editors rely on just the text available in the Abstract or first page - which is bad practice. Approved

   Aspro, we need email enabled to send you a login. You can do so through your preferences. The Interior (Talk) 09:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2. OR drohowa (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Hi! I already signed up for JSTOR access, and had it for a while, but now when I login to JSTOR, I have 'limited access' and am only able to see abstracts/ article listings but not full text! Is there an expiration period on our accounts and/or what is the renewal process? Thanks![reply]

   Hi OR drohowa, do you recall about when it was that you signed up for JSTOR? Juno (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

   Juno - we worked this out, see the talk page. The Interior (Talk) 22:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3. Arr4 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I usually edit in the articles of history, literature, politics and biography in English and Bengali wiki. It would be very helpful for me If I get access to the journal. My university does not give access to the alumni and none of the public library located near my house do not have access to JSTOR. - Arr4 (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
   • Approved Keep up the good work! Juno (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
4. Kiyoweap (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Active since September 2009. About 2500 edits on en, 1400 on ja. I focus on mythology & folklore of various cultures, and engage in a lot of fact-checking. I have subsisted on public domain resources and snippets, but would be helped by search and article access on JSTOR beyond "3 article" limit.--Kiyoweap (talk) 07:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
   • Approved Wonderful folklore work! Juno (talk) 19:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
5. Maury Markowitz (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) 7500+ new articles, 2 FAs, a number of GAs, perhaps 500 DYKs, admin, active 13 years. Write about precisely the sorts of articles that JSTOR has the best coverage of, science and tech that I otherwise can't get. No longer in university, about 50 km from nearest reference library. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

   Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

6. Jefferyseow (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I specialise in 19th Century British Malaya. Sources are hard to come by. Access to JSTOR would make work easier. I've been on Wikipedia since 15th April 2006. On Wikipedia I have made over 1,962 edits, written 87 entries, significantly contributed to 12. I've created 10 pages on Wikisource and uploaded at least two files to Commons.

    Pending: user is not very active at the moment. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

7. Maestro Ivanković (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an active Wikipedian since January 2012, mostly on Croatian Wikipedia where I mainly write about music and musicians (please, see my user page and edit counter if you want to know a little more about me). I don't have any institutional access to the JSTOR, so this possibility could certainly be very helpful to me regarding my future work on Wikipedia (globally). Thanks! Maestro Ivanković (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

   Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

8. 黑暗魔君 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active on Chinese Wikipedia. I recently focus on editing Islam-related articles. Access to JSTOR would be useful for me to improve those articles.--黑暗魔君 (talk) 01:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

   Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

9. Satdeep Gill (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)-- My application was approved earlier but i never got the password. I am sysop on pa.wiki and have been working for more than 5 years now. --Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 04:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

   Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10. Rsteen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active on Danish Wikipedia since 2007. Currently doing a project on 5th century history. This work would benefit greatly from access to contemporary articles that could be retrieved via JSTOR. --Rsteen (talk) 06:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11. Dmartyn80 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Working in Russian wiki after 2008, I have 24 FA, 25 GA etc. Mainly editing articles on ancient culture, China and Pre-Columbian Mexico, art of XIX cent. at all. --Dmartyn80 (talk) 11:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12. Mr. Pseudo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm mostly active in the sq.wiki (Albanian), with 3500+ edits. Furthermore, lately, I became an admin on sq.wiki. I have broad areas of interest. (In real life) I have in depth knowledge in the biomedical field (I prefer not to be too specific), despite not doing a lot of edits in this field in the wiki projects. I have translated different articles on the subject of politics, economy, and philosophy from the en.wiki... I'm also doing a sort of clean up process on the sq.wiki...- there is a lack of sources, especially on articles about Albanian history (or better to say, how the world has seen and sees Albania, and Albanian related matters.). Moreover I think that this would be a further reason to continue working on wiki projects. --Mr.Pseudo ^{Don't talk to me} 21:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
13. GregJackP (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I work primarily on law articles, especially dealing with American Indians. I have 3 FAs, 1 class A, and 15 GAs. I have a Four Award and am one of only 5 Wikipedians with a Valiant Return Triple Crown. I primarily do content, but have just lost my student access to JSTOR. GregJackP Boomer! 02:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Not approved, editor has marked their page as "retired". Please reapply if you return. The Interior (Talk) 15:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
14. Peripitus (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Mostly Australian history and geographical places. Local libraries are unfortunately a bit ordinary - Peripitus (Talk) 07:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
15. Jonathan Groß (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I'm mostly active on dewiki and dewikisource. Having access to JSTOR's contents would be a great help. Jonathan Groß (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
16. JackTheVicar (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) it would be good to have more resources to add to literary, arts, theology and history articles I have been planning to edit (and which are delayed because the research doesn't come by easy).--JackTheVicar (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
17. Peaceworld111 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I have access to JSTOR through my University but I am still unable to access much of the material. As I am and will be writing a number of articles, a better access would be helpful.--Peaceworld 16:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
18. nableezy (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Not as active as late but getting back into it, be useful for a number of topics I'm interested in editing in. nableezy - 20:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Pending, User:Nableezy, you don't have email enabled. We need that to get your login to you. The Interior (Talk)
19. object404 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Wikipedian since 2008, currently active. My current area of interest is Filipino martial arts, culture & history, now branching into Spanish, Latin American and historical European martial arts & colonies in tracing routes. I'm currently looking into accessing primary and secondary sources (Spanish, Mexican & American (Philippine-American War to World War II) colonial period records, journals, newspapers & publications (as well as Mexican ones) 1600s-1940s), but physical access to these are difficult from the Philippines. -Object404 (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Edit: No JSTOR alumni access at my university. -Object404 (talk) 23:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
20. Emilyvsthegorn (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I mostly edit biographical articles for women in history and the arts, and I'm also interested in serial killers. A lot of this information isn't available online outside of Google books, so I'd love access to JSTOR. I was very familiar with it when I was in college, so I believe I'd benefit from access. Thanks! EmilyvstheGorn (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Not approved, EmilyvstheGorn, thank you for applying, but currently you don't reach the minimum number of edits needed to qualify :( Please re-apply later! The Interior (Talk) 15:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
21. Ormr2014 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I contribute to Wikipedia in a number of categories, including religious, historical, and geographical. I also actively peruse the list of requested articles for creation and create those I can find sources for. This information would allow me to contribute to Wikipedia much more effectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ormr2014 (talk • contribs)

     Pending You haven't been very active lately, so we'll come back if there are accounts left over. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22. Jpbrenna (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I contribute to Wikipedia in a number of categories, especially in the history of Argos and the Argolid and recently, Greek and Roman women writers. I have started a stub article on Melinno, and I have cited the publicly available portion of a JSTOR article on her work, but I would like access to the full article for further citation. Additionally, I have noticed that many other articles on Greek and Roman writers, men and women, rely to much on shallow popular histories and could benefit from the citation of scholarly sources. This is especially important in cases of disputed authorship, where in order to avoid No original research, we need to present scholarly arguments for and against a particular attribution. I have graduated from university and no longer have free access to JSTOR.--Jpbrenna (talk) 23:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23. GeneralizationsAreBad (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I contribute to Wikipedia's military history articles, and I would love to have access to JSTOR, which is a great resource. It would provide me with a vast array of sources with which I could add content to articles; it would really enable me to expand the scale of my content. The ability to add scholarly content is so important on Wikipedia, and is especially helpful in contentious areas that need impartial analysis. As other editors have noted, it's very frustrating not to be able to view JSTOR articles in full. Thanks for your consideration. GeneralizationsAreBad

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24. Abecedare (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been using Jstor and Project Muse for my wikipedia edits to (esp.) India and Hinduism related articles for years. But my access to these resources will be spotty at best in the upcoming months. So am requesting access through wikipedia. Thanks. Abecedare (talk) 20:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25. Valenciano (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have created over 400 articles on various Wikipedias, mainly the English one. I contribute to articles on politics and other topics such as Spanish and Basque history and this would be useful for sourcing these adequately. Valenciano (talk) 21:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

26. Hatake (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been and editor and reviewer for about five years in sq.wiki with [+5000 edits], focusing for the most in the biographies of forgotten and prominent figures of the Albanian studies. I think that these resources can be a furthermore help to our objectives of polishing and enriching in the proper way these fields.--S. Saiti (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

     Pending You haven't been very active lately, so we'll come back if there are accounts left over. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27. West Virginian (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been an editor and reviewer on English Wikipedia for almost ten years, and continue to author new articles on historic places, significant events, and biographies. I rely upon JSTOR extensively, especially its periodicals, but my account has expired. I tend to write about subjects relating to West Virginia and Appalachia, regions underrepresented here on Wikipedia. -- West Virginian (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

28. KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) No access to JSTOR through local library; usually write on Oklahoma-related topics, including naval vessels named for state and cities, and access would be hugely helpful. KrakatoaKatie 01:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

29. Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Have made 39,000 edits since 2010. Mainly involved in content creation; access to JSTOR would be very useful. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 02:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

30. Plange (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Used to be heavily active back in '06 and am back again. My major concentration, and what I'd like to use JSTOR for is to improve the articles on romance and romance writers plange (talk) 01:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

     Pending You haven't been very active lately, so we'll come back if there are accounts left over. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

31. LaMona (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) No access to JSTOR locally. I generally edit pages for authors and academics, and hang out at AfD and AfC. I'm also trying to improve some articles (esp. in the library sciences) for which JSTOR access would be helpful since I work on historical topics and G-Scholar doesn't cover older material in the field. Thanks. LaMona (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

32. Yoninah (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have not been using my JSTOR account as much as I thought I would, and would like to give it over to another user. Yoninah (talk) 21:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks Yoninah, we'll take care of that shortly. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

33. Megalibrarygirl (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi! I'm active in contributing to articles relating to women and Chicana/o artists and a few other areas (like plant species). I've created several new articles in the past year. I have access to EBSCO (through my library) and project MUSE currently, but I'd love to use JSTOR too, if there's an opening. Thank you! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

34. SpacemanSpiff (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I was inactive for a while and therefore did not request access earlier, I'm back to being active. I'm primarily interested in access to articles relating to Indian history and Indo-Anglian literature, two areas where I find most sources behind Jstor walls. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 05:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

35. Wikicology (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active user since June 3, 2014, independent biochemist without institutional access to JSTOR. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

36. Biblioworm (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I plan to use JSTOR access to do research for articles concerning Medieval Europe (England, in particular) that I intend to work on. I have already seen several articles on JSTOR that could be useful for content creation/improvement, so I feel that having direct access would be much more convenient than continually requesting individual access to the article. I have made 7.5k edits, and am the author of two GAs and eight DYKs. Although I'm not fully active at the moment, I should return to normal activity levels in the near future, and I could still use my access to start obtaining materials for articles that I wish to improve. I carefully looked through all the available TWL resources, and I determined that the three for which I have applied (JSTOR, Questia, and OUP) will be the most useful. Thanks, --Biblioworm 02:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

37. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) New access. I do a lot of reference verifying and I have encountered a lot of published articles that are behind paywalls, leaving references unverified.~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

38. Adam majewski (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been on Wikipedia for 9 years, active on wikibooks, commons and wikipedia. I need acces to articles for checking the references. Adam majewski (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

39. Lingzhi (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Used to be Ling.Nut. Currently have 6 FA articles, etc. Will chip in at FAC/FAR/FARC; will add content (next project gender pay gap. • Lingzhi♦(talk) 07:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

40. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I'm an active editor, since 2007, with dozens of FAs, GAs, and new articles to my credit. A JSTOR account would be very helpful to me with the literature articles I focus on. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

41. Mxn (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've been active here and at various other Wikimedia wikis since 2003. JSTOR access would be useful fleshing out existing articles such as pho and for verifying citations in articles like Philip J. Pauly. – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 07:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
42. Sadads (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - Just lost University access to JSTOR, one of the primary tools I use for writing about novels. Hope to start #100wikidays soon, and would like to have this at my fingertips. Sadads (talk) 12:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
43. Eric Corbett (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've had a subscription for a year now and found it very useful, but it has recently expired. Eric Corbett 23:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • User:Eric Corbett, access has been extended. Please try your login again, and let me know if you have trouble getting in. The Interior (Talk) 15:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Working fine again now, thanks. Eric Corbett 17:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
44. Xufanc (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active user since 2008. I write mainly about history. Having access to JSTOR would be very helpful. Xufanc (Xufanc (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

45. Sachinvenga (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) If possible let me use these valuable resources for editing.-- . Shlok _{talk .} 12:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

     Pending You haven't been very active lately, so we'll come back if there are accounts left over. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

46. Xover (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Maintaining and verifying references, and creating and expanding articles, within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare (e.g. my current long term project: Edmond Malone). --Xover (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

47. Mel22 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I frequently need jstor to read articles about history of art (I mainly contributes on paintings and illuminated manuscripts) and there is no library with a jstor account at less than 40 kms from my home. Thanks a lot.Mel22 (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

48. MSJapan (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have gotten heavily into source verification checking and article expansion wherever it strikes my fancy, and journal access is a good way to find material that I can't find elsewhere, especially on historical/niche topics. MSJapan (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

49. Epicgenius (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm primarily active in expanding US- and railroad-related articles on enwiki, especially on articles about New York. However, many of the sources that I need aren't easily accessible. Epic Genius (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

50. ClarkSui (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I am primarily active in expansion of Spanish reconquista era articles on enwiki. Currently I want to explore the colonial history of Asia and require access to sources not easily available. - Clark Sui (talk) 03:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

51. Checkingfax (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), my active areas on Wikipedia are all over. I would use JSTOR as a resource to find references to provide them to pages marked citation needed. I would also use JSTOR to research new articles, and to expand existing stub articles. Thank you for considering my application. Checkingfax (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

52. Jamesmcardle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) An academic who is now retired, I certainly miss access to this wonderful resource, which I have found invaluable for research in my area of the Arts. As a WPL Coordinator in outreach and communication, it will assist my volunteering efforts to be familiar with access functions for this resource within WP.sinarau (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

53. lirazelf (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Wikimedian in Residence at Museums Galleries Scotland. This would be really very useful for editathons and other WiR events! Lirazelf (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

54. Ochilov (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor in Russian Wikipedia, need access to sources from JSTOR, because I need to write articles about Greek geography and Ancient Egypt. --Ochilov (talk) 10:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

55. Yopienso (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) User ID:1177838. I edit in U.S. Presidents and history generally, creationism/evolution, climate matters, and whatever catches my fancy. After graduation, I lost my Jstor privileges. :( I've been around since 2006 but not continuously active. I've made about 5600 edits. YoPienso (talk) 08:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC) ___ Thank you! YoPienso (talk) 16:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

56. zeorymer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I edit English articles on Portugal and associated topics, including the Azores, and wish to improve referencing on subjects associated with history, politics, geography and culture, in a body work little referenced with scientific works. ^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Approved Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

57. chjoaygame (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I mostly edit Wikipedia articles on thermodynamics and philosophy. I would like to be able to access articles via JSTOR for this purpose. I already have a personal JSTOR account, but I don't seem to have a Wikipedia-generated one.Chjoaygame (talk) 07:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

     Not approved If you already have a personal JSTOR account, this access is unlikely to be helpful for you. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

58. Anythingyouwant (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I often edit in US legal and political articles, and have edited hundreds of other article subjects as well. I expect to be editing a lot of music articles soon (a "tool" is currently under development for my task). I've also edited a lot in physics and math (which were my undergraduate major and minor), plus using the random article function to find articles that I have then improved. Biographies of living persons is another area of interest where I've contributed.Anythingyouwant (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this will be useful. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. JAaron95 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I meet the minimum requirements above. I work in areas like AfC and DRN and hence, I'd like to have access to the restricted materials of JSTOR. I will make best use of the resources. Regards—☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
   • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
2. Peripatetic (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've created over a thousand articles in my 10+ years as an editor. References like JSTOR are extremely handy. Thanks! --Peripatetic (talk) 01:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
   • Approved The Interior (Talk) 15:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
3. Yoav Nachtailer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My request is on Wikipedia:JSTOR/Approved#Approved accounts, Round 3 - November 2014, but I've never got the email with my password. I'm an active user (admin) on Hebrew Wikipedia with 15,000+ edits and 50+ articles. Jstor will help me improve my writing alot. Yoav Nachtailer (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
4. Davidbena (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am active on the English-Wikipedia, mostly in Jewish-related articles and in history. I am interested in gaining access to this academic journal for its invaluable content, and being able to confidently cite from it in the references that are posted by me, whether in articles that I have written or in articles that I have contributed to.Davidbena (talk) 12:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
5. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I had access for one year which expired in July. Is it possible to be reinstated? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 00:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
6. Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I edit within various topics, but I am most interested in contributing in topics related to ANE history and archæology. I use to have some access to journal articles in the past, but it required me filling out a list of several requests, sending it off, and waiting for a long period (months) before the articles would be sent. This made it difficult to focus on any edits, additions, or verifications. I have — since then — focused more on minor corrections and bringing up questions on Talk pages, instead, since waiting for access to articles took too long. Easier access would make it easier to make more of the edits and additions I was previously interested in doing. Many thanks for your consideration. — al-Shimoni (talk) 06:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
7. Philippe (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) i'm returning to content creation after leaving the WMF, and would find the access quite useful. Thanks so much for consideration - if needed, I'm happy to wait a while and demonstrate content creation, i'm aware recent edit count is lacking. Thanks ;) -Philippe (talk) 06:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
8. dirtyharry667 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I don't know how many edits or contributions I have, but I have been a member for many years. I have written several articles and have helped clean up several others. My primary interests have to do with corporate history and retail history. My most recent contributions were the August Wagner Breweries page and I am in the process of reworking the Gamble-Skogmo page. Having access to these data bases would be very helpful in nailing down acquisitions and mergers and their dates.dirtyharry667 (talk) 3:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
9. WestCoastMusketeer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit on topics of Indian History, British India, Indian Military History, Forts, Temples, Churches. JSTOR access will be helpful for referring to historical documents and academic viewpoints "WestCoastMusketeer (talk) 07:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)"[reply]
10. Davidcannon (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit mostly Fiji-related topics, and I'm intending to branch out into other Pacific Island topics. Finding credible resources for them is a pain in the neck. Hopefully, JSTOR will help remedy that problem. David Cannon (talk) 08:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
11. Goochelaar (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I used to be more active than I am today, but still quite active-ish. Having a doctorate in maths (but I am no more at a university, so I have no more access to JSTOR there) and being an English to Italian translator, I'd tend to edit hard science and Italian language and literature articles, but nowadays mostly correct/update/fix whatever details I stumble while researching for my work(s). Goochelaar (talk) 10:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
12. Maurice Carbonaro (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi there, I am pretty more active in reading than editing. In the past I tried several times to get access to JSTOR for several reasons (Embryonic stem cell research on diabetes mellitus type 2 for example) but I gave up because I had to pay. I would like to have the opportunity to access to this service. Thanks for your time.   M aurice  10:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
13. La Alquimista (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been a user since 2008, sporadically active, especially around the reference desks, but also edited a few articles n books and movies. I'm currently a doctoral student of linguistics and would like access to JSTOR so that I can contribute towards linguistics articles (phonetics/phonology/ computational linguistics). La Alquimista 10:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
14. Snowgrouse (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 1000+ edits; my activity comes and goes. I mostly go around fixing typos and other mistakes all over the site. I used to be more active in the Hindu articles a few years ago, but often I keep burning out thanks to them being constantly messed up by poor hit-and-run editors (they really are a mess), but I still do keep browsing them and fix mistaken information when I can. I used to study World Religions at university but had to retire young thanks to health issues, but still keep active reading about academic topics related to religions and contributing to the articles. JSTOR has a lot of useful stuff that I can't access otherwise (my illness would necessitate working from home and not through a library in any case).Snowgrouse (talk) 10:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
15. code16 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 1,213 edits (+ created 1 article recently). Active in the following areas: WikiProject Islam, Biographies, Military History/Warfare/Technology, Pakistan (among others less active in.) If you look at my recent contributions to this featured article, I created a new category and added more then 10 scholarly sources, making it one of the best sourced categories on the featured article. The article I created Ideas of Ghulam Ahmed Pervez is also very well sources for a new article, with over 30 citations. I'm a University of Toronto alumni, but unfortunately JSTOR does not provide alumni access for this institution. cӨde1+6 ^LogicBomb! 11:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
16. Eleuther (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 1457 edits. I revert vandalism and fix typos when I see them, but I'm mainly interested in editing articles about the history of functional analysis, quantum mechanics, mathematical logic, and so on. Access to the pre-1960 original papers in the JSTOR journals would be very useful to me. Thanks for your consideration. Eleuther (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
17. Rochelimit (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 6,662 edit. Joined Wikipedia since 2007, active since 2009. I'm an expert in mass rapid transit design and railway business, but also has strong interest in architecture, especially Dutch Colonial Architecture in Indonesia. Back in 2009 during my active year on my thesis, some important documents are available only in JSTOR journals. I was approved access by using my professor's account and find it extremely useful on researching the RUFUS (Rural Future Networks). JSTOR would improve my citing significantly.--Rochelimit (talk) 13:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
18. Paul venter (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Mainly contributions in bio-sciences Paul venter (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
19. SheriffIsInTown (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would like to benefit from JSTOR resources to further my Wikipedia editing experience. Sheriff (report) 15:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
20. Chuangzu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been active editing on Wikipedia since 2006, my main area is Chinese Martial Arts and Taoism, in particular the history of the Lee style T'ai Chi, I am also interested in the history of West Penwith in Cornwall, United Kingdom, where I live miles from the nearest University or Library so I need to use the internet for research.Chuangzu (talk) 16:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
21. Emerald Evergreen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Like a couple of others requesting access to this database, my need is not as great as others. I don't have 500 edits and most of my contributions have been minor edits. My contributions outside of that usually involve pointing out a discrepancy or outdated information I've found in someone's article. Nevertheless, I don't have access to JSTOR any other way and while I can't make any promises, access to this database might compel me to make more significant contributions if I stumbled upon an appropriate opportunity to do so. If you still have accounts to hand out, I would like to be considered for one. Emerald Evergreen 17:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
22. Human3015 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Have 10,500+ edits, I'm creating and interested in creating biographical articles on civilian award winning people. I have also created many geographical articles. Access to JSTOR will be always nice thing to improve referencing and quality of the article, specially when we have intention to nominate it for DYK. --Human3015^TALK  17:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
23. Melly42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Seems that my year at JSTOR is over. I would like to renew my account. --Melly42 (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
24. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active user since 2012 in portuguese wikipedia and sometimes in english. I am studying independently the history of beer in Brazil and I think that I would use the sources on JSTOR.--Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
25. Norfolkbigfish (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) TRying to get House of Plantagenet through FAC and need to seriously update the sources. After that—the crusades! Norfolkbigfish (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
26. Deipnosophista (talk · contribs) I've been an editor since 2006. My main Wiki interests are language(s) and culture(s), ancient and mediaeval history, philosophy and social sciences. I don't have access to JSTOR, which can be a problem. Deipnosophista (talk) 07:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
27. Pengo (talk · contribs) Editor and admin on Wikipedia. Work mostly on biosciences and taxonomy articles both here and on Wiktionary, where original research papers are sometimes needed to track down who and why names were given to living things. ——Pengo 08:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
28. Snowgrouse (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 1000+ edits; my activity comes and goes. I mostly go around fixing typos and other mistakes all over the site. I used to be more active in the Hindu articles a few years ago, but often I keep burning out thanks to them being constantly messed up by poor hit-and-run editors (they really are a mess), but I still do keep browsing them and fix mistaken information when I can. I used to study World Religions at university but had to retire young thanks to health issues, but still keep active reading about academic topics related to religions and contributing to the articles. JSTOR has a lot of useful stuff that I can't access otherwise (my illness would necessitate working from home and not through a library in any case).Snowgrouse (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
29. William Quill (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My edits are mainly on Irish history, law and politics. Access to JSTOR would definitely be useful to check references in these areas. I formerly had access through Trinity College, but I'm no longer there. --William Quill (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
30. Vituzzu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm mainly active on it.wiki but here on en.wiki I focus my attention in patrolling history-related articles. My main focus are modern history and electronics engineering. I was once selected for HB access but a "dramatic failure" of my email addresses prevented me from activating it. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
31. Pleonic (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hello! I've been editing on Wikipedia for something over 10 years now. My interests are somewhat ecclectic but I believe JSTOR access would help with history (esp., 19th century US, medieval studies,and 200 BCE - 200 CE middle east) archaeology, and biography in those eras, Christian history, theology, theologians, and biblical scholarship as well as early Buddhism, Taoism, and religious studies in general. Also computer science, and early films. Pleonic (talk) 01:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
32. lexaxis7 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I am active in adding to the history and scholarship of photography, photographers and visual aesthetics. There are articles in journals that are available only in JSTOR that would be very useful to my ability to contribute more frequently. Lexaxis7 (talk) 02:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
33. امین اکبر (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am admin at Urdu Wikipedia and also active on English Wikipedia. JSTOR account will help me to work better. Ameen Akbar (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
34. Diptanshu.D (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an editor of medical articles of Wikipedia and have more than 12000 edits to my credit. I often improve the references for an article and a JSTOR subscription will be helpful in this regard.Diptanshu^Talk 02:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
35. GDW13 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing since 2006 on a wide variety of articles and am always looking for reliable sources. Access to this resource would be a great addition to my toolbox used for contributing to Wikipedia. GDW13 (talk) 07:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
36. Chhandama (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) A researcher and an ardent editor/author on the history of science, biology, biography of scientists, medicine and pharmacology, I always come across vital documents in JSTOR. It will be of great use to Wikipedia if I could access these. Chhandama (talk) 11:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
37. 5minutes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active since 2005. I have a broad range of interests, including history, nature, politics, and technology. As I've recently begun my Master's degree (at a non-JSTOR university), I have recently re-discovered the value of scholarly journals to all levels of my personal, professional, and institutional research. I've also re-discovered the frustration of relying on abstracts for data, and would like to gain access to JSTOR to improve my abilities. Thanks for the consideration! 5minutes (talk) 12:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
38. The Hermes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been on Wikipedia since 2006. After a break, I have come back post-retirement, to devote myself full-time to Wikipedia. I am fully convinced that Wikipedia is going to be the ultimate repository of all human knowledge and that post-retirement writing/editing on Wiki is going to be my best occupation. Access to this resource can enhance my work very much. The Hermes (talk) 13:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
39. Rus793 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been a Wikipedian for over 9 years, active on Simple and the English Wikipedia. I'm a content editor and patroller (Simple). I need access to verify refs, make improvements and for sourcing new articles. Lost access when I moved. Thanks. User:Rus793|Talk? 15:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC) 15:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
40. DaltonCastle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a veteran editor with a wide range of topics I write about. Chief among them are politics, political corruption, human rights, law, history, corporate finance, economics, & tech firms. I would love to have access to JStor to provide additional resources for page creations! Let me know what more you need to know! Thank you for this opportunity! DaltonCastle (talk) 17:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
41. Neuralia (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I believe I meet the requisites, thank you Neuralia (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
42. Tanet (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am very interested in adding JSTOR to my traditional resources for references and reliable sources, hence I'll give further details to my articles. --Kiwi (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
43. Laodah (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) You'll see from my edit history that I'm a little bit everywhere, all the time, on WP; in theory I'm a grammar gnome, but my extensive article sweeps, together with my own use of WP, mean that I end up doing a lot of fact-checking and adjusting, particularly in history and social science articles. I have no access to JSTOR through my local library; such access would make it possible for me to do more textual edits than at present, by cutting down the time required to verify and cite. Thanks for the consideration. Laodah 22:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
44. daqu (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing for close to 10 years, above all mathematics articles (I'm a Ph.D. research mathematician without a current affiliation), but many other topics as well. I have greatly benefited from having access to JSTOR via institutional affiliation up through June 2013, but I currently have no access through any source. JSTOR access now would be a tremendous boon for editing WIkipedia articles as well as for conducting my own mathematics research.Daqu (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
45. Ле Лой (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I’m a prolific Russian Wikipedia user, authoring more than 500 articles and celebrating my 8th Wikipedia cakeday next month. I am mostly interested in linguistics and anthropology, but often make contributions to random articles. I’ve used JSTOR before, but the paywall prevents me from reading/writing more. — Le Loi 03:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
46. Lawrencekhoo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I recently moved from one educational institution to another, and am in the office a lot more than before. I hope to use the time to improve some of the more dismal articles under the auspices of the Economics wikiproject. Unfortunately, my new educational institution does not provide access to JSTOR articles. Having access to journal articles would be a great help to my improving various Economics articles. Thanks! LK (talk) 03:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
47. KJRehberg (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a frequent copyeditor and fact checker for as many Wikipedia articles as I can get my hands on. Having access to JSTOR would be a great resource to correct and cite even more articles, including those I have written myself. Thank you. KJRehberg (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
48. Zezen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing wiki articles since 2010 (and also before, as an IP contributor). I specialize in social history of Central Europe. A number of my edits require sourcing through archival newspaper content, unavailable in archive.org, etc. , so I had to give up on expanding the created or modified articles for the lack of verifiable refs, alas. Zezen (talk) 11:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
49. Alekksandr (talk · contribs) My first edit was in July 2008 and my edit count is over 6000. My interests include Irish history (in particular judicial offices), UK and Irish political history (in particular elections and office-holders), royalty and anything else that tickles my interest (;-) Alekksandr (talk) 21:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
50. Epolk (talk · contribs) I have been an editor for a decade. Per X!'s Tools I have over 17,000 edits, around 14,000 on unique pages. As the number of articles on Wikipedia have reached a critical mass, I have moved from creating and proofreading articles to creating citations for articles. The publicly available sources for searching scholarly works usually point to an abstract for an article or a pay site (e.g. JSTOR) so my ability to provide accurate and complete citations are limited. As for my areas of interest, they tend toward history and the sciences, especially zoology as this area seems to be most in need of expansion and citation of sources. Epolk (talk) 03:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
51. CielProfond (talk · contribs) Mostly interested by astronomy, JSTOR is an awesome source of information. CielProfond (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
52. Hanang_Hubby (talk · contribs) I wanna be the member in here. Hanang Hubby (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
53. 20040302 (talk · contribs) Active user since 2nd March 2004. Primary work is in Buddhism and Buddhist philosophy with several crossover areas. Particularly interested insome of the modern philosphical papers related to Madhyamaka. (20040302 (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]
54. CV9933 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I focus on repairing cite errors, finding, verifying and adding citations to articles lacking sources 220,000 backlog and expanding stubs. CV9933 (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
55. ClemRutter (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I have delayed applying until it was absolutley necessary- but now the time has come. I am a London based content creator, working on follow ups to edit-a-thons, on cotton mills in Lancashire, sundials listed buildings etc., basically doing academic work and some training. I have been around seriously since 2007 created 816 pages and done 2OOO edits this year- and over on commons you will find 8500 of my images. This is the season for checking references. Thanks. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
56. JmCor (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I have been using JSTOR for about two years, under their "Shelf" system, which is limited to a maximum of three items at a time. I am mostly interested in the history of science and would use JSTOR to access articles in that area. JmCor (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
57. Neuralia (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
58. Fredericknoronha (talk · contribs) Still awaiting the promised access... so trying again :-)
59. MrPenguin20 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Mostly work on areas relating to politics and history, with a specific focus on Britain & the Arab world. That being said, my range is extremely broad. Whilst I previously enjoyed access through my university, the program doesn't extend to alumni. Academic sources naturally often provide information which can't be accessed freely elsewhere. Many thanks. MrPenguin20 (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
60. Almanacer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been an active editor since 2007 maintaining and verifying references, and creating and expanding articles in the humanities especially areas of controversy where a wide range of citations from academic journals are referenced. Almanacer (talk) 09:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
61. Барсов (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi, I've been mostly editing and writing Russian articles on Wikipedia. I'm interested in JSTOR, as it will help me to write more articles on the history of education science.--Барсов (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
62. Hgilbert (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing for 10 years, in which time I've accumulated more than 16,000 edits. I usually focus on articles related to education, philosophy, and -- more rarely -- politics. Many of the articles I reference are available through JSTOR. HGilbert (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
63. LeftAire (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing since 2011, among my main articles are Ornithology and Historical related articles. I've requested access through OUP, but I'm thinking that I may also need full access to JSTOR; my university unfortunately doesn't have full access, especially for some of the Latin-American related articles I can potentially use. LeftAire (talk) 01:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]