User talk:Anjo-sozinho: Difference between revisions
Anjo-sozinho (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
::You have been told now by three editors to seek consensus! [[User:Hebel|Gerard von Hebel]] ([[User talk:Hebel|talk]]) 16:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC) |
::You have been told now by three editors to seek consensus! [[User:Hebel|Gerard von Hebel]] ([[User talk:Hebel|talk]]) 16:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::You are promoting false information and threatening me, [[User:Hebel|Gerard von Hebel]]? [[User:Anjo-sozinho|Anjo-sozinho]] ([[User talk:Anjo-sozinho#top|talk]]) 17:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:03, 30 August 2015
Welcome
|
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louise de Marillac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Please do not change article titles or infoboxes after concerns about doing so have been raised. If your bold edit is reverted then go to the talk page and discuss the edit. Only when consensus favors the edit should the edit then be made. DrKiernan (talk) 16:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Duarte Pio
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.
- You have been told now by three editors to seek consensus! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are promoting false information and threatening me, Gerard von Hebel? Anjo-sozinho (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)