Eisspeedway

Talk:Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
99801155KC9TV (talk | contribs)
m 99801155KC9TV moved page Talk:Jimmy Savile child abuse allegations to Talk:Jimmy Savile child sexual abuse allegations: The new title is more precise than the former one.
Auction: new section
Line 9: Line 9:


Can I just point out, although I personally have no problem at all with the way it is worded, strictly speaking it is not a police "investigation" - in fact, the police have specifically denied it is (yet) an investigation or inquiry. It's not at all clear WHAT it is and one would assume/suspect an investigation will be launched but, as of 11th October, 2012, it is still not officially recognized as such. Sorry, don't want to be picky, as I said, I have no problem with the way it is worded, just depends on how cautious you wish to be about factual and current reporting. Thanks. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.198.51.21|90.198.51.21]] ([[User talk:90.198.51.21|talk]]) 19:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Can I just point out, although I personally have no problem at all with the way it is worded, strictly speaking it is not a police "investigation" - in fact, the police have specifically denied it is (yet) an investigation or inquiry. It's not at all clear WHAT it is and one would assume/suspect an investigation will be launched but, as of 11th October, 2012, it is still not officially recognized as such. Sorry, don't want to be picky, as I said, I have no problem with the way it is worded, just depends on how cautious you wish to be about factual and current reporting. Thanks. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.198.51.21|90.198.51.21]] ([[User talk:90.198.51.21|talk]]) 19:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Auction ==

People are now complaining about the items that they bought at the auction.[http://news.sky.com/story/996611/buyer-of-jimmy-saviles-rolls-royce-gutted] Might be worth a mention in the article (BTW, the Corniche was quoted as going for £130,000 at the time).--'''''[[User:ianmacm|<span style="background:#88b;color:#cff;font-variant:small-caps">♦Ian<span style="background:#99c">Ma<span style="background:#aad">c</span></span>M♦</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ianmacm|(talk to me)]]</sup>''''' 07:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:03, 12 October 2012

WikiProject iconYorkshire Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconJimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

Wouldn't Jimmy Savile child abuse allegations be a better title? Yes, it is a scandal, but the word is a little loaded.--ukexpat (talk) 13:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, moved page. My opinion is that this has blown into a big investigation and undoubtedly reports will continue to surface. I think it quite rightly deserves an article and I think details of the investigation would bloat out the main article and result in OVERDUE. The Thereoux dopcumentary definitely needs mentioning where he said about him being "the most feared man in girl's school in Britain" and denying it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just point out, although I personally have no problem at all with the way it is worded, strictly speaking it is not a police "investigation" - in fact, the police have specifically denied it is (yet) an investigation or inquiry. It's not at all clear WHAT it is and one would assume/suspect an investigation will be launched but, as of 11th October, 2012, it is still not officially recognized as such. Sorry, don't want to be picky, as I said, I have no problem with the way it is worded, just depends on how cautious you wish to be about factual and current reporting. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.51.21 (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Auction

People are now complaining about the items that they bought at the auction.[1] Might be worth a mention in the article (BTW, the Corniche was quoted as going for £130,000 at the time).--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]