1860 Wiyot massacre: Difference between revisions
m →Event: verbose |
Ellin Beltz (talk | contribs) added photo, checked categories, expanded citation format to include isbns & checked the URLs, removed redundant wikilinks |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==History== |
==History== |
||
===Event=== |
===Event=== |
||
Immigrant settlers had settled in the area since the [[California Gold Rush]], over the 10 years before the massacre. The [[Wiyot]] were a peaceful tribe that had never fought with white settlers and had no reason to expect an attack.<ref name=" |
[[File:Indian_Island_Tolowot_California.jpg|250 px|right|Indian Island Tulawat]]Immigrant settlers had settled in the area since the [[California Gold Rush]], over the 10 years before the massacre. The [[Wiyot]] were a peaceful tribe that had never fought with white settlers and had no reason to expect an attack.<ref name="Rohde">{{cite web |
||
| last =Rohde |
|||
| first =Jerry |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title =Genocide and Extortion: 150 years later, the hidden motive behind the Indian Island Massacre |
|||
| work = |
|||
| publisher =North Coast Journal |
|||
| date = 25 February 2010 |
|||
| url =http://www.northcoastjournal.com/news/2010/02/25/genocide-and-extortion-indian-island/ |
|||
| format = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| accessdate = 25 March 2012}}</ref> |
|||
To avoid drawing attention from nearby Eureka residents, some of whom may not have condoned the genocidal killings, the attackers primarily used hatchets, clubs and knives. Contrary to a commonly held view, guns were used to murder Indians, |
To avoid drawing attention from nearby Eureka residents, some of whom may not have condoned the genocidal killings, the attackers primarily used hatchets, clubs and knives. Contrary to a commonly held view, guns were used to murder Indians, because some Eureka residents reported hearing shots that night but knowledge of the genocidal acts were not widely known at the time.<ref name="norton">{{cite book |
||
| last = Norton |
|||
| first = Jack |
|||
| title = Genocide in northwestern California : when our worlds cried |
|||
| publisher = Indian Historian Press |
|||
| location = San Francisco |
|||
| year = 1979 |
|||
| page=82 |
|||
| isbn = 0913436262 }}</ref> |
|||
===Deaths=== |
===Deaths=== |
||
Based upon |
Based upon Wiyot Tribe estimates, 80 to 250 Wiyot men, women, and children were murdered. Because most of the adult able-bodied men were away gathering supplies as part of continuing preparation for the World Renewal Ceremony, nearly all the Wiyot men murdered are believed to have been older men, which is one reason why the Wiyot were largely defenseless. It is untrue to say the Wiyot were killed with ease because they were "exhausted from the annual celebration." The celebration usually lasted seven to 10 days, and the men traditionally left at night for the supplies while the elders, women and children slept. That is why most victims were children, women and elder men. |
||
Arcata's local newspaper, the ''[[Northern Californian]]'', described the scene as follows: |
Arcata's local newspaper, the ''[[Northern Californian]]'', described the scene as follows: |
||
<blockquote>Blood stood in pools on all sides; the walls of the huts were stained and the grass colored red. Lying around were dead bodies of both sexes and all ages from the old man to the infant at the breast. Some had their heads split in twain by axes, others beaten into jelly with clubs, others pierced or cut to pieces with bowie knives. Some struck down as they mired; others had almost reached the water when overtaken and butchered.<ref name="norton" |
<blockquote>Blood stood in pools on all sides; the walls of the huts were stained and the grass colored red. Lying around were dead bodies of both sexes and all ages from the old man to the infant at the breast. Some had their heads split in twain by axes, others beaten into jelly with clubs, others pierced or cut to pieces with bowie knives. Some struck down as they mired; others had almost reached the water when overtaken and butchered.<ref name="norton" /></blockquote> |
||
===Survivors=== |
===Survivors=== |
||
There were few survivors. One woman, Jane Sam, survived by hiding in a trash pile. Two cousins, Matilda and Nancy Spear, hid with their three children on the west side of the island and later found seven other children still alive. A young boy, Jerry James, was found alive in his dead mother's arms. Polly Steve was badly wounded and left for dead, but recovered. One of the few |
There were few survivors. One woman, Jane Sam, survived by hiding in a trash pile. Two cousins, Matilda and Nancy Spear, hid with their three children on the west side of the island and later found seven other children still alive. A young boy, Jerry James, was found alive in his dead mother's arms. Polly Steve was badly wounded and left for dead, but recovered. One of the few Wiyot men on the island during the attack, Mad River Billy, jumped into the bay and swam to safety in Eureka.<ref name="Rohde" /> Another woman, Kaiquaish (also known as Josephine Beach) and her eleven month old son William survived by not being on the island in the first place. Kaiquaish had set out in a canoe with her son to take part in the ceremonies, but became lost in the fog and was forced to return home before the attacks began.<ref name="HumboldHistorian">{{cite journal |
||
| last = |
|||
| first = |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title =Letter to the Editor |
|||
| journal =Humboldt Historian |
|||
| volume =58 |
|||
| issue =2 |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| date = |
|||
| url = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| id = |
|||
| accessdate = }}</ref> |
|||
===Coordinated attacks=== |
===Coordinated attacks=== |
||
The Tuluwat/Indian Island massacre was part of a coordinated simultaneous attack that targeted other Wiyot sites around [[Humboldt Bay]], including an encampment on the [[Eel River (California)|Eel River]].<ref name="Rohde" /> Though the attack was widely condemned in newspapers outside of Humboldt County, no one was ever prosecuted for the murders.<ref name = "NYT">{{cite news |
|||
| last = |
|||
The Tuluwat/Indian Island massacre was part of a coordinated simultaneous attack that targeted other [[Wiyot]] sites around [[Humboldt Bay]], including an encampment on the [[Eel River (California)|Eel River]]. Though the attack was widely condemned in newspapers outside of [[Humboldt County, California|Humboldt County]], no one was ever prosecuted for the murders.<ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9E06E0DF133FE034BC4A52DFB266838B679FDE New York Times article], April 12, 1860</ref> One writer in nearby Union (now [[Arcata, California]]), the then-uncelebrated [[Bret Harte]], wrote against the killers and would soon need to leave the area due to the threats against his life. Several local citizens also wrote letters to the [[San Francisco, California|San Francisco]] papers condemning the attacks and naming suspected conspirators.<ref name="rossiter">Charles Rossiter, "More of the Humboldt Bay Butchery," ''San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin'', March 2, 1860.</ref> |
|||
| first = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title =From California: The Humboldt Butchery of Indian Infants and Women... & c. |
|||
| work = |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| language = |
|||
| publisher =New York Times |
|||
| date =16 March 1860 |
|||
| url =http://www.nytimes.com/1860/04/12/news/california-humboldt-butchery-indian-infants-women-jacob-elyea-hanged-bogus.html |
|||
| accessdate = 25 March 2012}}</ref> One writer in nearby Union (now [[Arcata, California]]), the then-uncelebrated [[Bret Harte]], wrote against the killers and would soon need to leave the area due to the threats against his life. Several local citizens also wrote letters to the [[San Francisco, California|San Francisco]] papers condemning the attacks and naming suspected conspirators.<ref name="rossiter">{{cite news |
|||
| last =Rossiter |
|||
| first =Charles |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title =More of the Humboldt Bay Butchery |
|||
| work = |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| language = |
|||
| publisher =San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin |
|||
| date =2 March 1860 |
|||
| url = |
|||
| accessdate = 25 March 2012}}</ref> |
|||
==Investigation== |
==Investigation== |
||
Motive for the attacks was never clearly established. The local sheriff, Barrant Van Ness, stated in a newspaper editorial published in the ''San Francisco Bulletin'' a few days after the massacre that the motive was revenge for cattle rustling. Ranchers in the inland valleys claimed as much as one-eighth of their cattle had been stolen or slaughtered by Indians over the previous year, and one rancher, James C. Ellison, was killed while pursing suspected rustlers in May 1859. However, the area where the ranches were located was occupied by the [[Nongatl]] tribe, not the Wiyot, so the victims of the massacre would not have been responsible for any rustling. Van Ness closed his written statement by saying he did not excuse the killers for their deeds.<ref name="BVN">{{cite web |
|||
| last =Van Ness |
|||
| first = Barrant |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title =The Humboldt Bay Massacre-Statement of the Sheriff of Humboldt County |
|||
| work = |
|||
| publisher =National Intelligencer |
|||
| date =31 March 1860, |
|||
| url =http://hilead.eurekabooksellers.com/2009/02/indian-island-massacre-excused.html |
|||
| format = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| accessdate = 25 March 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
Major [[Gabriel J. Rains]], Commanding Officer of [[Fort Humboldt]] at the time, reported to his commanding officer that a local group of vigilantes had resolved to "kill every peaceable Indian - man, woman, and child."<ref name="Carranco,page 129-130">{{cite book |
|||
Motive for the attacks was never clearly established. The local sheriff, Barrant Van Ness, stated in a newspaper editorial published in the ''San Francisco Bulletin'' a few days after the massacre that the motive was revenge for cattle rustling. Ranchers in the inland valleys claimed as much as one-eighth of their cattle had been stolen or slaughtered by Indians over the previous year, and one rancher, James C. Ellison, was killed while pursing suspected rustlers in May 1859. However, the area where the ranches were located was occupied by the [[Nongatl]] tribe, not the [[Wiyot]], so the victims of the massacre would not have been responsible for any rustling. Van Ness closed his written statement by saying he did not excuse the killers for their deeds.<ref name="B Van Ness Letter">[http://hilead.eurekabooksellers.com/2009/02/indian-island-massacre-excused.html The Humboldt Bay Massacre-Statement of the Sheriff of Humboldt County], March 31, 1860, ''National Intelligencer'', Washington, D.C.</ref> |
|||
| last =Carranco |
|||
| first =Lynwood |
|||
Major [[Gabriel J. Rains]], Commanding Officer of [[Fort Humboldt]] at the time, reported to his commanding officer that a local group of vigilantes had resolved to "kill every peaceable Indian - man, woman, and child."<ref name="Carranco">''Genocide and Vendetta: The Round Valley Wars of Northern California'', Lynwood Carranco and Estle Beard, page 129-130.</ref> The vigilantes, calling themselves the ''Humboldt Volunteers, Second Brigade'', had been formed in early February 1860 in the inland town of [[Hydesville, California|Hydesville]], one of the ranching communities in the [[Nongatl]] area. They spent most of February "in the field" attacking Indians along the [[Eel River (California)|Eel River]]. A petition had been sent to California Governor [[John G. Downey]] asking that the ''Humboldt Volunteers'' be mustered into service and given regular pay.<ref name="TimesFeb25">''Humboldt Times'' article, February 25, 1860</ref> Downey declined the petition, stating that the U.S. Army was sending an additional Company of Regulars to [[Fort Humboldt]].<ref name="Rhode" /> |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors =Estle Beard |
|||
| title =Genocide and Vendetta: The Round Valley Wars of Northern California |
|||
| publisher =University of Oklahoma Press |
|||
| date =November 1981 |
|||
| location = |
|||
| pages =384 |
|||
| url = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| id = ISBN-13: 978-0806115498 }}</ref> The vigilantes, calling themselves the ''Humboldt Volunteers, Second Brigade'', had been formed in early February 1860 in the inland town of [[Hydesville, California|Hydesville]], one of the ranching communities in the Nongatl area. They spent most of February "in the field" attacking Indians along the Eel River. A petition had been sent to California Governor [[John G. Downey]] asking that the ''Humboldt Volunteers'' be mustered into service and given regular pay.<ref name="TimesFeb25">{{cite news |
|||
| last = |
|||
| first = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title = |
|||
| work = |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| language = |
|||
| publisher =Humboldt Times |
|||
| date =25 February 1860 |
|||
| url = |
|||
| accessdate = }}</ref> Downey declined the petition, stating that the U.S. Army was sending an additional Company of Regulars to Fort Humboldt.<ref name="Rohde" /> |
|||
==Consequences== |
==Consequences== |
||
The Wiyot Tribe said the |
The Wiyot Tribe said the Wiyot people were not allowed to return to the island or their other land, and they often found their land stolen and/or destroyed. Soldiers from Fort Humboldt took many of the surviving Wiyot into protective custody at the fort, later transporting them to the Klamath River Reservation.<ref name="bulletin">{{cite news |
||
| last = |
|||
| first = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title = |
|||
| work = |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| language = |
|||
| publisher =San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin |
|||
| date =11 May 1860 |
|||
| url = |
|||
| accessdate = }}</ref> Recently, the Wiyot have been repurchasing the land in order to perform their annual World Renewal Ceremony.<ref name "SSF">{{cite web |
|||
| last = |
|||
| first = |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title =Sacred Sites Fund |
|||
| work = |
|||
| publisher =Wiyot Tribe |
|||
| date =2012 |
|||
| url =http://www.wiyot.com/sacred-sites-fund |
|||
| format = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| accessdate = 25 March 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 39: | Line 151: | ||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wiyot Massacre 1860}} |
|||
{{Populations of Native California Groups}} |
{{Populations of Native California Groups}} |
||
{{Traditional Narratives (California groups)}} |
{{Traditional Narratives (California groups)}} |
Revision as of 01:25, 28 March 2012
40°48′54″N 124°09′40″W / 40.815°N 124.161°W Template:Campaignbox Bald Hills War
The Wiyot Massacre refers to the incidents on February 26, 1860, at Tuluwat on what is now known as Indian Island, near Eureka in Humboldt County, California.
History
Event
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3253b/3253b31948b3d8c36db63f0641be1847ac3f12d8" alt="Indian Island Tulawat"
Immigrant settlers had settled in the area since the California Gold Rush, over the 10 years before the massacre. The Wiyot were a peaceful tribe that had never fought with white settlers and had no reason to expect an attack.[1]
To avoid drawing attention from nearby Eureka residents, some of whom may not have condoned the genocidal killings, the attackers primarily used hatchets, clubs and knives. Contrary to a commonly held view, guns were used to murder Indians, because some Eureka residents reported hearing shots that night but knowledge of the genocidal acts were not widely known at the time.[2]
Deaths
Based upon Wiyot Tribe estimates, 80 to 250 Wiyot men, women, and children were murdered. Because most of the adult able-bodied men were away gathering supplies as part of continuing preparation for the World Renewal Ceremony, nearly all the Wiyot men murdered are believed to have been older men, which is one reason why the Wiyot were largely defenseless. It is untrue to say the Wiyot were killed with ease because they were "exhausted from the annual celebration." The celebration usually lasted seven to 10 days, and the men traditionally left at night for the supplies while the elders, women and children slept. That is why most victims were children, women and elder men.
Arcata's local newspaper, the Northern Californian, described the scene as follows:
Blood stood in pools on all sides; the walls of the huts were stained and the grass colored red. Lying around were dead bodies of both sexes and all ages from the old man to the infant at the breast. Some had their heads split in twain by axes, others beaten into jelly with clubs, others pierced or cut to pieces with bowie knives. Some struck down as they mired; others had almost reached the water when overtaken and butchered.[2]
Survivors
There were few survivors. One woman, Jane Sam, survived by hiding in a trash pile. Two cousins, Matilda and Nancy Spear, hid with their three children on the west side of the island and later found seven other children still alive. A young boy, Jerry James, was found alive in his dead mother's arms. Polly Steve was badly wounded and left for dead, but recovered. One of the few Wiyot men on the island during the attack, Mad River Billy, jumped into the bay and swam to safety in Eureka.[1] Another woman, Kaiquaish (also known as Josephine Beach) and her eleven month old son William survived by not being on the island in the first place. Kaiquaish had set out in a canoe with her son to take part in the ceremonies, but became lost in the fog and was forced to return home before the attacks began.[3]
Coordinated attacks
The Tuluwat/Indian Island massacre was part of a coordinated simultaneous attack that targeted other Wiyot sites around Humboldt Bay, including an encampment on the Eel River.[1] Though the attack was widely condemned in newspapers outside of Humboldt County, no one was ever prosecuted for the murders.[4] One writer in nearby Union (now Arcata, California), the then-uncelebrated Bret Harte, wrote against the killers and would soon need to leave the area due to the threats against his life. Several local citizens also wrote letters to the San Francisco papers condemning the attacks and naming suspected conspirators.[5]
Investigation
Motive for the attacks was never clearly established. The local sheriff, Barrant Van Ness, stated in a newspaper editorial published in the San Francisco Bulletin a few days after the massacre that the motive was revenge for cattle rustling. Ranchers in the inland valleys claimed as much as one-eighth of their cattle had been stolen or slaughtered by Indians over the previous year, and one rancher, James C. Ellison, was killed while pursing suspected rustlers in May 1859. However, the area where the ranches were located was occupied by the Nongatl tribe, not the Wiyot, so the victims of the massacre would not have been responsible for any rustling. Van Ness closed his written statement by saying he did not excuse the killers for their deeds.[6]
Major Gabriel J. Rains, Commanding Officer of Fort Humboldt at the time, reported to his commanding officer that a local group of vigilantes had resolved to "kill every peaceable Indian - man, woman, and child."[7] The vigilantes, calling themselves the Humboldt Volunteers, Second Brigade, had been formed in early February 1860 in the inland town of Hydesville, one of the ranching communities in the Nongatl area. They spent most of February "in the field" attacking Indians along the Eel River. A petition had been sent to California Governor John G. Downey asking that the Humboldt Volunteers be mustered into service and given regular pay.[8] Downey declined the petition, stating that the U.S. Army was sending an additional Company of Regulars to Fort Humboldt.[1]
Consequences
The Wiyot Tribe said the Wiyot people were not allowed to return to the island or their other land, and they often found their land stolen and/or destroyed. Soldiers from Fort Humboldt took many of the surviving Wiyot into protective custody at the fort, later transporting them to the Klamath River Reservation.[9] Recently, the Wiyot have been repurchasing the land in order to perform their annual World Renewal Ceremony.[10]
References
- ^ a b c d Rohde, Jerry (25 February 2010). "Genocide and Extortion: 150 years later, the hidden motive behind the Indian Island Massacre". North Coast Journal. Retrieved 25 March 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ a b Norton, Jack (1979). Genocide in northwestern California : when our worlds cried. San Francisco: Indian Historian Press. p. 82. ISBN 0913436262.
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: checksum (help) - ^ "Letter to the Editor". Humboldt Historian. 58 (2).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ "From California: The Humboldt Butchery of Indian Infants and Women... & c." New York Times. 16 March 1860. Retrieved 25 March 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Rossiter, Charles (2 March 1860). "More of the Humboldt Bay Butchery". San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Van Ness, Barrant (31 March 1860,). "The Humboldt Bay Massacre-Statement of the Sheriff of Humboldt County". National Intelligencer. Retrieved 25 March 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ Carranco, Lynwood (November 1981). Genocide and Vendetta: The Round Valley Wars of Northern California. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 384. ISBN-13: 978-0806115498.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ . Humboldt Times. 25 February 1860.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ . San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin. 11 May 1860.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ "Sacred Sites Fund". Wiyot Tribe. 2012. Retrieved 25 March 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)
External links
- New York Times article, April 12, 1860