Archives

/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, MrMoustacheMM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 17:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another user has created a bundle AfD nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Codex Necro. This nomination includes 6 other related articles, and in going through page histories to notify the respective article creators, I noticed you edited most, if not all of them. Please weigh in if you can. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's only thing that needs redundancy because Mike did not write all the songs it also needs to be a little more clear as to who wrote what songs instead of just saying all other songs because it causes a little confusion as to who wrote the songs when it says akesson wrote part of the songs as to why he didn't write the others so it can fully state that Mike wrote the songs solely . As for the note thing, I don't know if you saw what I typed in the edit summary but that note is not part of the title. It makes it seem like the songs name is "The Lotus Eater (Misspelled in the us...)".Mtlv0 (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well you did understand me right, I was just lazy with punctuation etc. I know that you mention on top that all music is written by mike except where noted but I find that statement, something that should not be type because it's either he wrote all songs or not so if it's not then the exact writing credits should be listed but this is a complaint for the track listing template to rectified. As for the lotus eater title, although most will get that the title is not "The Lotus Eater (Misspelled as...)", you will see for other songs, brackets are used (to identify within song) that it is used as a subtile to the name of the song. Songs like "Terminus (Where Death is Most Alive)" from Fiction by Dark Tranquillity or "A Paler Shade of White (A Darker Side of Black)" from He Who Shall Not Bleed by Dimension Zero have these brackets so if you are going to keep the description maybe change it to quotations but it should be removed in total and placed somewhere else on the page. Plus you don't see a lot of pages typed like that with such a long note type on side because I can endless amouNt of info on the side of song like that it has a music video or that it is a single etc.Mtlv0 (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to point out if it is really necessary to have the note with the title because other music pages aren't like that.Mtlv0 (talk) 21:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at any other album wiki page, none have info listed beside the track.Mtlv0 (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So can we green light the removal of the side text of lotus eater?Mtlv0 (talk) 20:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

now that you have merged the tracks, I'd like to point out something I've discussed with Backtable. What you have merged here now is the Italian track listing, so should you still list as special edition??? Should the writers column come back? cause Trower and Fredriksson aren't listed. lastly if you were to put the total length in the tracklist edit it would separate the original track listing from the special edition so that means shouldn't all other pages have reissue, special edition etc, separated? what do you think bout the track listing for Metallica (album).Mtlv0 (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was a subpage of Naïve. Sub pages are moved with the page. I'll look at this and if needed, move it back. Thanks for the heads up. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it looks like the article was not moved, just the talk page which was moved back. If I'm missing something, let me know. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How come freecovers.net is not good? as for credits I feel as there are no need have guitar, acoustic guitar when guitar covers everything. I also don't like in the credits the redundancy opeth this and opeth that, opeth members are already listed so just type what each member does all ready extra. I figure if having all songs written by opeth then put engineered, mixed, etc. And can you plez respond to my last question about watershed because I don't think it follows any of the polices you've listed for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtlv0 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

check the ghost reveries page how it's written in notes (which I did not do) which is a great looking page, sry missed ur message very small and not altered to me. Ok now I get the sites carrying copywritten material is not allowed, the polices are too technically written in which you have explained to me in simple english. Thnx for agreeing on the credits, if you can help me type out correctly, it would be much appreciated. Lastly I kinda agree on specifcs but I've been blasted on it before when I typed on the Resurrection Through Carnage page that Mike does Death vocals but someone said no, vocals covers everything.Mtlv0 (talk) 03:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

remember how we were talking about names being repeated on this page? well I changed it before but did you revert my edits? so do we keep it as it is or credit all the other stuff to opeth?Mtlv0 (talk) 18:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the lines where it says that it did not chart in the us and that it is recorded in august, is repeated twice, do we really need that?C0un+5 (talk) 05:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

where it says Opeth began to record Blackwater Park on 10 August 2000 and in the recording info on the side box August-October 2000C0un+5 (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok yes keep it in the info box but repeat it on the page again?C0un+5 (talk) 06:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

y?C0un+5 (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is TKO Capone still in there? he is not notable. We have a heading of concept. So why not orgainize it with other headings? why put up the augusut 18 date when opeth.com has 1997 and disogs has 11 of may?Mtlv0 (talk) 04:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on headings and discogs, but hey, the ghost rev page looks very organized, imo better than previous edits, I guess we can't agree on that. As for the year release, if you point on each opeth album, on the diff pages they have there it shows the release of the album so i'm not taking about the recording year on the side.Mtlv0 (talk) 04:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only record that opeth struggled to release is orchid (a year after it was recorded) much like MA,YH meaning that MA,YH was released in a normal timeframe.Mtlv0 (talk) 05:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

forgot to ask, when is that page (or others) considered long enough to have headings? the intro is huge!Mtlv0 (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why does that column exist for?Mtlv0 (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Think there could be a lot of things relevant to a track such as discrepancies, release dates towards the song prior to the album, etc. I am for one a fan of the note column and so are others that's why it exists and I have no idea why you despise it immensely. If you are not down for the whole note thing then yes please remove the "trivia piece" from the track and at least put it somewhere else on the page.Mtlv0 (talk) 22:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know that there is no note column. I was referring to the extra column and it's a good column cause it is open to notes, artists, albums etc. So like you say the note is for text but not necessarily next to the song. I know that we don't have to put note, I figure only if its for importance in which these are not trivial info. I can't seem to find an article stating the incorrect track spell of lotus eater when the best I can do is a link of a physical image to it but like you've said before it goes with copywrites. So Lastly yes then that text must be removed. Is there a policy not allowing notes cause I might of missed that in your statements against it?Mtlv0 (talk) 01:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know that we can't hide the bonus tracks when there's one bonus track listing but can it be separated like the Morningrise]?Mtlv0 (talk) 18:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point but shouldn't bonus tracks be separated from the original? and if you are to merge these bonus tracks how do you decide which one to merge with if there a multiple reissues?Mtlv0 (talk) 19:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But the whole policy thing of having reissues listed on the side of the song, isn't similar to having the description of the song like once again the infamous lotus eater incident?Mtlv0 (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtlv0 (talk • contribs)

Hello sir. Please only keep one link for the emo on the infobox of My Chemical Romance. I realize that you faced bias editors recently. I didn't want to revert your addition, so you'll have a chance to pick the best <ref> you like :). Take care and happy editing ~ AdvertAdam ^talk 04:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, seen you removed the ratings for Deconstruction and Ghost, just wondering why, I'd have thought that Metal Hammer would be a good source? Hercules rockafella (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ah ok, Ive only started editing so still getting used to it all! thanks Hercules rockafella (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you improve the lead on Morningrise? T.R.Elven (talk) 16:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:DASH Simply put, the problem here is having a space, then a line wrap, and then a dash/space/text. It's confusing to the reader to see a line end that way. I didn't really have anything to do with drafting the style for it, so I can't say more than that, but I'm sure you could find out at the talk archives there. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You selectively read WP:CRYSTAL. You conveniently overlooked "Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place." Wikipedia does not include release dates for films and albums until they actually occur. Now please stop edit warring and take it to the talk page if you wish to challenge policy. 24.163.39.217 (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re this edit: WP:MOSDAB specifies "Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information.", so I have replaced the blue link on that entry. PamD 07:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of that, thanks for letting me know! I'll keep it in mind for the future. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you see a revert due to vandalism thing on the Dave Mustaine page, that was me getting confused over the various versions avaliable. Again, apologies for that, I've sorted it now Drivenapart (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it happens. Thanks for the note! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 04:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because on Devin Townsend official page the "O" is said to be capitalized. Just this ok?