Eisspeedway

Talk:Hypodontia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 99.141.137.105 - ""
Preslethe (talk | contribs)
Actual numbers?: new section
Line 6: Line 6:


This is--at best--confusing. Could someone with dental knowledge fix this? Nkb 1/2/10 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.141.137.105|99.141.137.105]] ([[User talk:99.141.137.105|talk]]) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This is--at best--confusing. Could someone with dental knowledge fix this? Nkb 1/2/10 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.141.137.105|99.141.137.105]] ([[User talk:99.141.137.105|talk]]) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Actual numbers? ==

Wow. This article doesn't say what typical numbers of human teeth are. Nor does the article on [[hyperdontia]]. Nor apparently does the very long "[[Tooth (human)]]" article (which doesn't start discussing specifically ''human'' teeth until the ''third'' paragraph, with three of the four introductory paragraphs ''not'' focusing on ''human'' teeth). (Article on human teeth? Let's write about sharks, beavers, voles, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.) — [[User:Preslethe|President Lethe]] ([[User talk:Preslethe|talk]]) 06:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:50, 1 January 2011

WikiProject iconDentistry Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Hypodontia describes a situation where the patient is missing 6 teeth or less, excluding the 3rd molars or wisdom teeth." - this article

"Absence of one or more wisdom teeth is an example of hypodontia." -Wikipedia article on wisdom teeth

This is--at best--confusing. Could someone with dental knowledge fix this? Nkb 1/2/10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.137.105 (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actual numbers?

Wow. This article doesn't say what typical numbers of human teeth are. Nor does the article on hyperdontia. Nor apparently does the very long "Tooth (human)" article (which doesn't start discussing specifically human teeth until the third paragraph, with three of the four introductory paragraphs not focusing on human teeth). (Article on human teeth? Let's write about sharks, beavers, voles, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.) — President Lethe (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]