Talk:Hypodontia: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 99.141.137.105 - "" |
→Actual numbers?: new section |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is--at best--confusing. Could someone with dental knowledge fix this? Nkb 1/2/10 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.141.137.105|99.141.137.105]] ([[User talk:99.141.137.105|talk]]) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This is--at best--confusing. Could someone with dental knowledge fix this? Nkb 1/2/10 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.141.137.105|99.141.137.105]] ([[User talk:99.141.137.105|talk]]) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Actual numbers? == |
|||
Wow. This article doesn't say what typical numbers of human teeth are. Nor does the article on [[hyperdontia]]. Nor apparently does the very long "[[Tooth (human)]]" article (which doesn't start discussing specifically ''human'' teeth until the ''third'' paragraph, with three of the four introductory paragraphs ''not'' focusing on ''human'' teeth). (Article on human teeth? Let's write about sharks, beavers, voles, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.) — [[User:Preslethe|President Lethe]] ([[User talk:Preslethe|talk]]) 06:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:50, 1 January 2011
![]() | Dentistry Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
"Hypodontia describes a situation where the patient is missing 6 teeth or less, excluding the 3rd molars or wisdom teeth." - this article
"Absence of one or more wisdom teeth is an example of hypodontia." -Wikipedia article on wisdom teeth
This is--at best--confusing. Could someone with dental knowledge fix this? Nkb 1/2/10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.137.105 (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Actual numbers?
Wow. This article doesn't say what typical numbers of human teeth are. Nor does the article on hyperdontia. Nor apparently does the very long "Tooth (human)" article (which doesn't start discussing specifically human teeth until the third paragraph, with three of the four introductory paragraphs not focusing on human teeth). (Article on human teeth? Let's write about sharks, beavers, voles, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits.) — President Lethe (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)