Eisspeedway

User talk:JzG/Archive 8: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Onthost (talk | contribs)
Line 72: Line 72:


:Like I said on your Talk page, read [[WP:AUTO]] and [[WP:BIO]]. - [[User:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] <sup>[[User_talk:JzG|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JzG|[C]]]</sub> [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] ''[[User:JzG/AfD|AfD?]]'' 09:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
:Like I said on your Talk page, read [[WP:AUTO]] and [[WP:BIO]]. - [[User:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] <sup>[[User_talk:JzG|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JzG|[C]]]</sub> [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] ''[[User:JzG/AfD|AfD?]]'' 09:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
::I agree with you on this one, big time. The #1 worst person to edit biographical information is the person the bio is written about. [[User:Onthost|Mike]] 19:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:21, 9 January 2006

Beware of the tigers!
This page may contain strong opinons. You have been warned.

New year, new username

I'm changing my username as the old one takes up too much space in edit summaries. Still using the same alias, though. - Guy

What concerns?

[1] What concerns would those be? FeloniousMonk 18:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like your new username

Dear Guy. I'm sorry to tell you. I will try to be honest. Your new username, even if I know it may silly what I say, I don't like it. Now you know me very well and since you know I have a deep respect to you I have to tell you this. I loved the other long, very nice username, so I suggest you should change it back. I respect your decision, whatever this will be, but I hope you'll change it back. That long name gave you a stylish and nice looking signature. It represents a lot more info then the current one. It was very nice and I loved it. Maybe you remember that maybe I was the first who asked you about the origin of your name since it has a "romanian" word in it. Just zis Guy, you know? it was my friend's name that I was always glad to see on the talk page deffending me. You were my support in many difficult times and I want to thank you. I may have not sufficient thanked you for this. Please change it back. You'll still be my friend, I guess I'll have to get used with this change. I just wanted to tell this since I've seen on my watchlist this change. I respect your changing but I had to tell you. It gives so much of you that long name. Please reconsider. Bonaparte talk 18:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to tell you that it was written by once, so, as a second thaught I just want to assure you that I hope I will be also a support for you. Maybe a change is good from time to time and if you needed then I simply have to support you. Bonaparte talk 18:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The sig looks the same, it's just that the username is shorter. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 19:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then I'm happy Guy! I didn't realized this :) Bonaparte talk 20:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also dislike the name change, although I have to say if you keep your sig piped it will work for me, and JzG is indeed shorter and easier to type. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of people use JzG as an abbreviation anyway, for some reason the rather obvious and equally short Guy does not seem to occur to them :-) - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 16:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I always used Guy, although I confess I was usually tempted to use Zaphod, which would have really confused people. KillerChihuahua?!? 17:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator?

I was wondering if you ever considered being an administrator? I would be happy to nominate you on RfA. Ifnord 16:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this is the third time it's been suggested :-) I have seen a lot of admins driven away by opposition to decisions they've made and I have also seen several who have used their admin powers in disputes in which they are personally involved (and I am sure I would be tempted to do the same), so I am very wary, as my judgment is not always as clear as I'd like it to be. On the other hand, access to deleted edits would be extremely useful sometimes... - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 16:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have found your comments on AfD to be level-headed and positive. You have done a ton of fine editing and writing. You seem to think you don't have the best judgment, I humbly disagree. I think anyone who doubts their judgment demonstrates good insight and a willingness to learn from their own mistakes. I will happily nominate you, you can always decline. =) Ifnord 16:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Larvatus

In the most recent round of e-mailed court filings from Larvatus (the zipped TIFF files, not the PDFs) you'll find the documents (use the Bates number to identify each):

  1. The draft complaint from the law offices of David Affeld filed against Min Zhu for childhood sexual abuse, assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress on behalf of Erin Zhu, his daughter and plaintiff. Entered as evidence in 1-02-CV-809286 Bates number P1116
  2. Interview entered as evidence in 1-02-CV-809286, in which Erin provides background and description of molestation. Bates number P1128
  3. E-mail entered as evidence in 1-02-CV-809286 in which Erin Zhu states her father, Min Zhu, molested her at age fourteen. Bates number P0596
  4. E-mail entered as evidence in 1-02-CV-809286 in which Zeleny demands payment from WebEx for services rendered. Bates number P0629

As court filings all are public record. Filings 1-2 (P1116, P1128) substantiate that Erin Zhu retained the Law Offices of David Affeld to sue her father for childhood molestation. Filing 3 (P0596) confirms that she shared the story with others, namely Blixa Bargeld. Filing 4 (P0629) confirms that Zeleny pursued WebEx to settle the debt owed Erin Zhu and Zeleny (dba ptyx). This debt begat the lawsuit FeloniousMonk 17:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have found some evidence as to claims of molestation, but only repudiation of the specific claim of rape as made by Larvatus. There is also some question over how reliable these claims may be, given the complex personal history of the parties involved. But there is more to read yet. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 18:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You must be using User:Jnothman's AfD helper userscript to vote on the AfD for the A&W how-to manual. I had the same problem: the user script broke on the & in A&W and made the above page. If you haven't done so already, you might want to transfer your vote to the correct A&W subpage, slap a {{db-author}} on the broken subpage, and one of us should contact User:Jnothman with a bug report... Segv11 (talk/contribs) 01:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - it also breaks if there's a ' in the title :-) I did fix my vote, we should speedy the remaining page I guess. Or redirect it. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 10:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

stop editing biographical information

I have added BY CHOICE information about my own designing efforts. I though this was an encyclopedia for ALL information in the world? So why can't I add biography?? You got biography for Kaffe Fassett - HE is still alive so your argument of no information about living people won't stick!!!

Who better than I to add a biography about my WORK... I am not talking about hobbies, families, etc, just my WORK!!!

Nathalie Forster

Like I said on your Talk page, read WP:AUTO and WP:BIO. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 09:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you on this one, big time. The #1 worst person to edit biographical information is the person the bio is written about. Mike 19:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]