Eisspeedway

Template talk:Interrupted: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Skagedal (talk | contribs)
Substing: new section
SebastianHelm (talk | contribs)
Improved wording
Line 7: Line 7:


Is it mandatory to [[WP:SUBST]] this template? If so: 1) why? 2) stating so explicitly, like on [[Template:Unsigned]] would be good. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 10:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Is it mandatory to [[WP:SUBST]] this template? If so: 1) why? 2) stating so explicitly, like on [[Template:Unsigned]] would be good. /<tt>[[User:Skagedal|skagedal]]</tt>[[User_talk:Skagedal|<sup>...</sup>]] 10:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
: No, I don't see why it would be mandatory. As a matter of fact, we're trying to improve the text right now, and it wouldn't be so bad if that were reflected whereever this template has been used. &mdash; [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

== Improved wording ==
I never liked the word "interrupted", it always seemed curt to me. So here's a proposal that came up at [[WP:RD/L]]: Reword the text to "-- ''OriginalPoster'' - (continues after intermediary text below)". I will do that soonish if there's no objection. &mdash; [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:37, 6 August 2009

This should be moved to "Girl:" space. Which would leave us with the delightful "Girl talk: Interrupted", just like in the playground when I was even younger. Splash - tk 22:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? MilesAgain (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He's punning with Girl, Interrupted (his link for "Girl:" space) and Girl talk 69.49.44.11 (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substing

Is it mandatory to WP:SUBST this template? If so: 1) why? 2) stating so explicitly, like on Template:Unsigned would be good. /skagedal... 10:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't see why it would be mandatory. As a matter of fact, we're trying to improve the text right now, and it wouldn't be so bad if that were reflected whereever this template has been used. — Sebastian 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improved wording

I never liked the word "interrupted", it always seemed curt to me. So here's a proposal that came up at WP:RD/L: Reword the text to "-- OriginalPoster - (continues after intermediary text below)". I will do that soonish if there's no objection. — Sebastian 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]