User talk:Ikip: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::I wanted to move my sections on the Fascism and Conservatism in the Talk page to the main page of RfC:Collect and wonder if you could do this for me as I am not familiar on what formatting and presentation is required. [[User:The Four Deuces|The Four Deuces]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 22:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC) |
::I wanted to move my sections on the Fascism and Conservatism in the Talk page to the main page of RfC:Collect and wonder if you could do this for me as I am not familiar on what formatting and presentation is required. [[User:The Four Deuces|The Four Deuces]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 22:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
==barnstar== |
|||
Thanks, whilst I am nominating some articles for deletion, I can assure you I do not nominate most I see for deletion. I have also created about 6 new articles on X-Y relations. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 03:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:12, 5 May 2009
Awards and articles I created. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]()
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report
Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1 wikipediareview: History of wikipedia |
more for the list
RE: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Collect
[4]. you could use this as an example of not getting along well w/ others, strawman arguments, general rudeness ("I have now editted well over 250 pages -- and I think you have not. Thabnks! And please feel free not to reply. Collect (talk) 11:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)") or a new section composed of his false accusations w/out apology or acknowledgment. or you dont have to use this at all. i just thought it was a good example of poor behavior on his part. Brendan19 (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- It would be much more convincing if you created your own section, or added this to your section. I am going over 5,000 edits, so it is hard to add everything, even with the magic of collapsible sections. Ikip (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ikip. Here are a series of deletions on Joe the Plumber that you were also involved with. This would fall under the section of deleting well sourced content:
I'm personally fine adding these to my section, but yours is very well structured and helpful so I'll follow your recommendation. Also this cite (already in the list above) [9] shows Collect reintroducing OR, where he brings in legal research and applies to Joe.Mattnad (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I wanted to move my sections on the Fascism and Conservatism in the Talk page to the main page of RfC:Collect and wonder if you could do this for me as I am not familiar on what formatting and presentation is required. The Four Deuces (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
barnstar
Thanks, whilst I am nominating some articles for deletion, I can assure you I do not nominate most I see for deletion. I have also created about 6 new articles on X-Y relations. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)