Talk:SAS: Difference between revisions
86.138.47.194 (talk) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I've suggested that we merge the [[sas]] disambig page here because there are only two entries on it, and I doubt people will always type in the right capitalization. It's a pain to have to load two pages instead of one. I envision two sections, the word sas at the top and the abbreviations after. Thoughts? [[User:Delldot|Delldot]] 16:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC) |
I've suggested that we merge the [[sas]] disambig page here because there are only two entries on it, and I doubt people will always type in the right capitalization. It's a pain to have to load two pages instead of one. I envision two sections, the word sas at the top and the abbreviations after. Thoughts? [[User:Delldot|Delldot]] 16:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*Agreed, they should be merged. [[User:Ethan0|Ethan]] 23:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC |
*Agreed, they should be merged. [[User:Ethan0|Ethan]] 23:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC |
||
Yes, they should be merged |
* Yes, they should be merged (anon) |
||
* Merge done. [[User:Jmason888|Jamie]] 11:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:24, 14 November 2005
There is a link to this page from Programming languages. However, I do not see SAS listed as a language. Is it a computer language in addition to the others listed? - Texture 18:08, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- It's a product of SAS Institute. Cathy Linton 18:15, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Is it called "SAS" or something else? - Texture 18:29, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Someone keeps adding the line
Sas - an extremly annoying mothatrucka.
To this article anonymously. I've reverted twice already in the last few days, what is this about and can something be done about it? Corma 14:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Merge
I've suggested that we merge the sas disambig page here because there are only two entries on it, and I doubt people will always type in the right capitalization. It's a pain to have to load two pages instead of one. I envision two sections, the word sas at the top and the abbreviations after. Thoughts? Delldot 16:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed, they should be merged. Ethan 23:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC
- Yes, they should be merged (anon)
- Merge done. Jamie 11:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)