LGBTQ+ studies Template‑class

This template is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Multidel

Resolvedapproved --cooljuno411 02:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add a see also section?--cooljuno411 06:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• agree, i think it is needed--cooljuno411 06:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolvedapproved --cooljuno411 02:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we add a see also section, should we add Perceived sexual orientation to the see also section?--cooljuno411 06:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• agree, sounds like it would make a great fit. The article needs some exposure to be expanded.--cooljuno411 06:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be 2 articles, Homosexuality and Homosexual orientation. Can this be reflected in the template? Phoenix of9 (talk) 19:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, only Homosexual orientation is in the template. Phoenix of9 (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree, there should be both on the template--cooljuno411 20:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose The template is for orientations and were the main article, Homosexuality, not split, that's where it would go to. Instead it goes to the most appropriate target, Homosexual orientation. -- Banjeboi 05:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So maybe Orientation could be changed as "Orientation and Behaviour" so both Homosexuality and Homosexual orientation can be linked. Phoenix of9 (talk) 05:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about "Sexual orientation and labels"?--cooljuno411 07:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. One article is about homosexuality as a behaviour, the other as an orientation. So the title should be Orientation/Behaviour, with both Homosexuality and Homosexual orientation listed. Phoenix of9 (talk) 18:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HOW ABOUT: "Sexual orientation. labels, identities, and behaviour" as the title.--cooljuno411 19:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about the template was and is fine as just about orientations. Template creep doesn't help our readers. There's nothing preventing them from easily accessing the homosexuality, or any other, article easily linked on the connected articles. Templates help organize, not list every possible related subject and article. -- Banjeboi 20:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, a consensus, judge and jury of one? -- Banjeboi 05:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reverted, you have no consent... I waited over 5 days for other people's opinions.... way longer then the recommended 72hr waiting period.... you didn't make it to ellection day sweetie.... I was the only one who voted.... and it was a unanimous yes.... If you want to change the template, you need to propose a change, and wait atleast 72hr for opinions.... as i did.... Just because no one objected does not give you the right to over turn the will of the people....--cooljuno411 06:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't go down the route which seems to be edit warring. You were bold, I reverted and now we can discuss and hopefully get wider input. -- Banjeboi 20:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted your edit, you will need consensus before making altercations to the article. I recommend you start a new sub section, asking people if they wish to revert the edit..--cooljuno411 21:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC) To quote your article you posted in the history, "assume that silence implies consensus"..... there was silence for 5 days.... more than the 3 days recommended to wait for opinions.--cooljuno411 21:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean opinions can be ignored. If you're not willing to discuss your changes, be prepared to see them reverted. – Luna Santin (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]