User:Andries: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
:-( I think I am coming to the same conclusion.... |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Me too, see [[User talk:JdH#Bishop Alfred|Bishop Alfred]]. It is abundantly clear that Wikipedia is used routinely for advertising and spamming. Many articles are very biased indeed, and trying to fix that is a complete waste of time because well-meant efforts will be reverted immediately by the nuts and spammers. [[User:JdH|JdH]] 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
:Me too, see [[User talk:JdH#Bishop Alfred|Bishop Alfred]]. It is abundantly clear that Wikipedia is used routinely for advertising and spamming. Many articles are very biased indeed, and trying to fix that is a complete waste of time because well-meant efforts will be reverted immediately by the nuts and spammers. [[User:JdH|JdH]] 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
::I am beginning to agree as I came back to find the Brahma Kumaris article in a state of continual pruning, chop, chop, chop till all that remains will be an advert. They are even agreeing on using primary sources for their benefit.:-(PEACE[[User:TalkAbout|TalkAbout]] 05:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedians interested in Prem Rawat]] |
[[Category:Wikipedians interested in Prem Rawat]] |
||
[[Category:Wikipedians interested in the Roman Catholic Church]] |
[[Category:Wikipedians interested in the Roman Catholic Church]] |
||
Revision as of 05:34, 8 August 2007
I lost faith in Wikipedia. I welcome attempts outside the Wikipedia article name space to expose it as a forum masquerading as an encyclopedia.
- Me too, see Bishop Alfred. It is abundantly clear that Wikipedia is used routinely for advertising and spamming. Many articles are very biased indeed, and trying to fix that is a complete waste of time because well-meant efforts will be reverted immediately by the nuts and spammers. JdH 20:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am beginning to agree as I came back to find the Brahma Kumaris article in a state of continual pruning, chop, chop, chop till all that remains will be an advert. They are even agreeing on using primary sources for their benefit.:-(PEACETalkAbout 05:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)