Eisspeedway

International Mathematical Olympiad: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
193.151.57.5 (talk)
Dmitin (talk | contribs)
Line 27: Line 27:
*The [http://www.imo-2008.es/ 49th IMO] will be held in [[Madrid]], [[Spain]] in 2008.
*The [http://www.imo-2008.es/ 49th IMO] will be held in [[Madrid]], [[Spain]] in 2008.
*The [http://www.imo2009.de/ 50th IMO] will be held in [[Bremen]], [[Germany]] in 2009.
*The [http://www.imo2009.de/ 50th IMO] will be held in [[Bremen]], [[Germany]] in 2009.
*The 52th IMO will be held in the [[Netherlands]] in 2011.


==Past IMOs==
==Past IMOs==

Revision as of 08:09, 28 July 2007

The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is an annual mathematical olympiad for high school students. It is the oldest of the international science olympiads.

The first IMO was held in Romania in 1959. Since then it has been held every year except 1980. About 90 countries send teams of (at most) six students each (plus one team leader, one deputy leader and observers). Teams are not officially recognized - all scores are given only to individual contestants. Contestants must be under the age of 20 and must not have any post-secondary school education. Subject to these conditions, an individual may participate any number of times in the IMO.

The paper consists of six problems, with each problem being worth seven points. The total score is thus 42 points. The examination is held over two consecutive days; the contestants have four-and-a-half hours to solve three problems on each day. The problems chosen are from various areas of secondary school mathematics, broadly classifiable as geometry, number theory, algebra, and combinatorics. They require no knowledge of higher mathematics, and solutions are often short and elegant. Finding them, however, requires exceptional ingenuity and mathematical ability.

Each participating country, other than the host country, may submit suggested problems to a Problem Selection Committee provided by the host country, which reduces the submitted problems to a shortlist. The team leaders arrive at the IMO a few days in advance of the contestants and form the IMO Jury which is responsible for all the formal decisions relating to the contest, starting with selecting the six problems from the shortlist. As the leaders know the problems in advance of the contestants, they are kept strictly separated from the contestants until the second examination has finished; the contestants are accompanied to the IMO by their deputy leaders (and maybe observers as well).

Each country's marks are agreed between that country's leader and deputy leader and Co-ordinators provided by the host country (the leader of the team whose country submitted the problem in the case of the marks of the host country), subject to the decisions of the Chief Coordinator and ultimately the Jury if any disputes cannot be resolved.

Selection process

Awards

The participants are ranked based on their individual scores.

  • The total number of awarded medals is as close as possible to but not more than half the total number of contestants.
  • Subsequently the number of gold, silver and bronze medals is chosen such that their ratio approximates 1:2:3.
  • Participants who don't win a medal but who score seven points on at least one problem get an honorable mention.

Special prizes may be awarded for solutions of outstanding elegance or involving good generalisations of a problem. This last happened in 2005, 1995 and 1988, but was more frequent up to the early 1980s.

The rule that at most half the contestants win a medal is sometimes broken if adhering to it causes the number of medals to deviate too much from half the number of contestants. This last happened in 2006 when the choice was to give either 188 or 253 of the 498 contestants a medal.

Current and future IMOs

Past IMOs

Sources differ about the cities hosting some of the early IMOs. This may be partly because leaders are generally housed well away from the students, and partly because after the competition the students did not always stay based in one city for the rest of the IMO. The exact dates cited may also differ, because of leaders arriving before the students, and at more recent IMOs the IMO Advisory Board arriving before the leaders.

Venue Date Web site
 1   Braşov and Bucharest, Romania   23.07 - 31.07, 1959 
 2   Sinaia, Romania   18.07 - 25.07, 1960 
 3   Veszprém, Hungary   06.07 - 16.07, 1961 
 4   České Budějovice, Czechoslovakia   07.07 - 15.07, 1962 
 5   Warsaw and Wrocław, Poland   05.07 - 13.07, 1963 
 6   Moscow, Soviet Union   30.06 - 10.07, 1964 
 7   Berlin, GDR   03.07 - 13.07, 1965 
 8   Sofia, Bulgaria   03.07 - 13.07, 1966 
 9   Cetinje, Yugoslavia   02.07 - 13.07, 1967 
 10   Moscow, Soviet Union   05.07 - 18.07, 1968 
 11   Bucharest, Romania   05.07 - 20.07, 1969 
 12   Keszthely, Hungary   08.07 - 22.07, 1970 
 13   Žilina, Czechoslovakia   10.07 - 21.07, 1971 
 14   Toruń, Poland   05.07 - 17.07, 1972 
 15   Moscow, Soviet Union   05.07 - 16.07, 1973 
 16   Erfurt and East Berlin, GDR   04.07 - 17.07, 1974 
 17   Burgas and Sofia, Bulgaria   03.07 - 16.07, 1975 
 18   Lienz, Austria   07.07 - 21.07, 1976 
 19   Belgrade, Yugoslavia   01.07 - 13.07, 1977 
 20   Bucharest, Romania   03.07 - 10.07, 1978 
 21   London, United Kingdom   30.06 - 09.07, 1979 
 22   Washington, DC, United States   08.07 - 20.07, 1981 
 23   Budapest, Hungary   05.07 - 14.07, 1982 
 24   Paris, France   01.07 - 12.07, 1983 
 25   Prague, Czechoslovakia   29.06 - 10.07, 1984 
 26   Joutsa, Finland   29.06 - 11.07, 1985 
 27   Warsaw, Poland   04.07 - 15.07, 1986 
 28   Havana, Cuba   05.07 - 16.07, 1987 
 29   Sydney and Canberra, Australia   09.07 - 21.07, 1988 
 30   Brunswick, FRG   13.07 - 24.07, 1989 
 31   Beijing, China   08.07 - 19.07, 1990 
 32   Sigtuna, Sweden   12.07 - 23.07, 1991 
 33   Moscow, Russia   10.07 - 21.07, 1992 
 34   Istanbul, Turkey   13.07 - 24.07, 1993 
 35   Hong Kong   08.07 - 20.07, 1994 
 36   Toronto, Canada   13.07 - 25.07, 1995   [1] 
 37   Mumbai, India   05.07 - 17.07, 1996   [2] 
 38   Mar del Plata, Argentina   18.07 - 31.07, 1997   [3] 
 39   Taipei, Taiwan   10.07 - 21.07, 1998   [4] 
 40   Bucharest, Romania   10.07 - 22.07, 1999   [5] 
 41   Daejeon, South Korea   13.07 - 25.07, 2000   [6] 
 42   Washington, DC, United States   01.07 - 14.07, 2001   [7] 
 43   Glasgow, United Kingdom   19.07 - 30.07, 2002 
 44   Tokyo, Japan   07.07 - 19.07, 2003   [8] 
 45   Athens, Greece   06.07 - 18.07, 2004   [9] 
 46   Mérida, Mexico   08.07 - 19.07, 2005   [10] 
 47   Ljubljana, Slovenia   06.07 - 18.07, 2006   [11] 
 48   Hanoi, Vietnam   2007  [12] 

Notable past participants

  • Grigory Margulis (USSR) received IMO 1962 Silver medal. He became only the seventh mathematician ever to receive both a Fields Medal, in 1978, and a Wolf Prize in Mathematics, in 2005.
  • Grigori Perelman (USSR) wrote a perfect paper in IMO 1982 and received a Gold medal. He was awarded but declined to accept a Fields medal in 2006 for his work on proving the Poincaré conjecture, posed in 1904 and regarded as one of the most important and difficult open problems in mathematics. For that, he is eligible for a share of the $1,000,000 Millennium Prize offered by Clay Mathematics Institute.
  • Vladimir Drinfel'd (USSR) at the age of 15 wrote a perfect paper in IMO 1969 and received a Gold medal. He was awarded a Fields Medal in 1990.

Complete list of Fields Medal winners who also received IMO medals with corresponding years and medals received noted (G for Gold, S for Silver, and B for Bronze medal):

NameTeam IMO medal(s)  Fields medal  Wolf Prize 
 Grigory Margulis  Soviet Union IMO 1962 S19782005
 Vladimir Drinfel'd  Soviet Union IMO 1969 G1990
 Jean-Christophe Yoccoz  France IMO 1974 G1994
 Richard Borcherds  United Kingdom IMO 1977 S
IMO 1978 G
1998
 Timothy Gowers  United Kingdom IMO 1981 G1998
 Grigori Perelman  Soviet Union IMO 1982 G2006
 Laurent Lafforgue  France IMO 1984 S
IMO 1985 S
2002
 Terence Tao  Australia IMO 1986 B
IMO 1987 S
IMO 1988 G
2006

Notable achievements

  • Reid Barton (USA) was the first participant to win a Gold medal four times (1998-1999-2000-2001). Barton is also one of only seven four-time Putnam Fellow (2001-2002-2003-2004).
  • Christian Reiher (Germany) is the only other participant to have won four Gold medals (2000-2001-2002-2003); Reiher also received a Bronze medal (1999).
  • Wolfgang Burmeister (GDR) and Martin Harterich (FRG) are the only other participants besides Reiher to win five Medals with at least three of them Gold.
  • Ciprian Manolescu (Romania) managed to write a perfect paper (42 points) for Gold medal more times than anybody else in history of competition. He did it all three times he participated in IMO (1995-1996-1997). Manolescu is also a three-time Putnam Fellow (1997-1998-2000).
  • Eugenia Malinnikova (USSR) is the best female contestant in IMO history. She has 3 gold medals in IMO 1989 (41 points), IMO 1990 (42) and IMO 1991 (42), missing only 1 point in 1989 to precede Manolescu's achievement.
  • Terence Tao (Australia) participated in IMO 1986, 1987 and 1988, winning Bronze, Silver and Gold medals respectively. He won a Gold medal at the age of thirteen in IMO 1988, becoming the youngest person to receive a Gold medal. He received a Fields medal in 2006.
  • Oleg Golberg (Russia/USA) is the only participant in IMO history to win Gold medals for different countries: he won two for Russia in 2002 and 2003, then one for USA in 2004.
  • Team USA won IMO 1994 in unique style when all six members of the team wrote a perfect paper and thus received six Gold medals. This accomplishment has never been repeated and earned a mention in TIME Magazine.
  • Other teams that won IMO and had all members receive Gold medals are China 8 times (1992-1993-1997-2000-2001-2002-2004-2006) and Bulgaria once (2003).
  • Team Hungary won IMO 1975 in completely opposite and totally unorthodox way when none of the eight team members received a Gold medal (5 Silver, 3 Bronze). Second place team GDR also did not have a single Gold medal winner (4 Silver, 4 Bronze).

Multiple IMO winners

The following table lists all IMO Winners who have won at least three Gold Medals, with corresponding years and non-Gold Medals received noted (S for Silver medal, B for Bronze medal).

NameTeam(s)Years
 Christian Reiher  Germany  2000  2001  2002  2003  1999 B 
 Reid Barton  United States  1998  1999  2000  2001 
 Wolfgang Burmeister  GDR  1968  1970  1971  1967 S  1969 S 
 Martin Harterich  FRG  1986  1987  1989  1988 S  1985 B 
 László Lovász  Hungary  1964  1965  1966  1963 S 
 József Pelikán  Hungary  1964  1965  1966  1963 S 
 Nikolai Nikolov  Bulgaria  1992  1993  1995  1994 S 
 Kentaro Nagao  Japan  1998  1999  2000  1997 S 
 Vladimir Barzov  Bulgaria  2000  2001  2002  1999 S 
 Iurie Boreico  Moldova  2004  2005  2006  2003 S 
 Simon Norton  United Kingdom  1967  1968  1969 
 John Rickard  United Kingdom  1975  1976  1977 
 Sergey Ivanov  Soviet Union  1987  1988  1989 
 Theodor Banica  Romania  1989  1990  1991 
 Eugenia Malinnikova  Soviet Union  1989  1990  1991 
 Serguei Norine  Russia  1994  1995  1996 
 Yuly Sannikov  Ukraine  1994  1995  1996 
 Ciprian Manolescu  Romania  1995  1996  1997 
 Ivan Ivanov  Bulgaria  1996  1997  1998 
 Nikolai Dourov  Russia  1996  1997  1998 
 Tamás Terpai  Hungary  1997  1998  1999 
 Stefan Hornet  Romania  1997  1998  1999 
 Vladimir Dremov  Russia  1998  1999  2000 
 Mihai Manea  Romania  1999  2000  2001 
 Tiankai Liu  United States  2001  2002  2004 
 Oleg Golberg  Russia '02, '03 
 United States '04 
 2002  2003  2004 
 Béla András Rácz  Hungary  2002  2003  2004 
 Andrey Badzyan  Russia  2002  2003  2004 
 Rosen Kralev  Bulgaria  2003  2004  2005 

Sources

  • Steve Olson. Count Down. Houghton Mifflin, 2004. ISBN 0-618-25141-3. Describes the IMO (based on IMO 2000) from the viewpoint of the contestants, with general background information on various related issues (such as competitiveness).
  • Tom Verhoeff. The 43rd International Mathematical Olympiad: A Reflective Report on IMO 2002. Computing Science Report 02-11, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology. August 2002. PDF Describes the IMO (based on IMO 2002) from the viewpoint of the leaders, with a comparison to the International Olympiad in Informatics.

See also