Hi. Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was successful and I am now an admin. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ty. I've been working on Sugar Ray Robinson all day. For a guy who was ranked as the greatest boxer in history by ESPN.com, the Associated Press, and The Ring magazine, his article was pretty weak. That's the great thing about Wikipedia—yesterday morning I had no plans to work on his article, but after seeing a couple of books over my father's house yesterday, and drinking a couple of cups of coffee today, here I am working on his article. In the process, I'm learning new and fun stuff about someone that I knew a decent amount of stuff about, but was no expert on. There's just so much to do, I don't see how anyone could ever get tired of writing here, now dealing with people that's another story. As you well know... Quadzilla99 21:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we need more people with passion and a positive attitude. I like working on lesser known articles because there's a lower chance of bumping into someone who's completely negative and has nothing of any value whatsoever to contribute. I know you don't need my encouragement, but all the best, while here's hoping I stay the course. Chensiyuan 21:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It had never occurred to me before, but it sounds like possibility. Looking at Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria, it seems that there are a couple of big obstacles:

• 5. There is no obvious gap (missing or stub article) in the topic. when combined with:
• 6. Each article is of high quality

..means that all the players need good articles.

Furthermore, one of the 'Recommendations' is that: The topic is not overly large. There are currently 30 players listed in the squad, but I don't see why that is really a problem. It depends on the scope of the topic - do we want to include the articles listed on {{Arsenal F.C.}}?

Finding enough information to make a good article for each of the younger players however, is going to very difficult - many are currently stub class. Perhaps we should bring it up at the Arsenal F.C. article. I think User:Qwghlm could be a good ally if we want to go for this, as he contributed much to Arsenal's FA status. I've never really tried to create an FA, except to help out GilbertoSilvaFan with a few questions, so I may not be the most useful editor for such a challenge, but I'll help.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  18:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup I see what you're saying and I agree that gaps may be a problem. Will have to think through it before deciding the next step if any. Chensiyuan 12:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping by to say "thank you" for supporting me in my recent my RfA. I passed the vote, and am now an admin. It will take me some getting used to with the new tools, but I thank you again for the trust. Have a good one, and, as always, happy editing! Jmlk17 05:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not here to take offence and I know Chris Bosh plays mainly PF. I know this because I'm a Raptors fan. But I know and watched games that he played for center. For example, On January 22 2006, the game when Kobe scored 81, Bosh was a center. Also, on the page, Tweener (basketball) you will see Bosh as a PF/C tweener. I hope you understand my meaning. Tracy Mcgrady (Verson 2.0) 21:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Chensiyuan 21:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert properly formated citation because the rest of them are done incorrectly. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 23:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]