Eisspeedway

User talk:JGabbard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:JGabbard/Archive 6) (bot
JGabbard (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:


<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 02:27, 19 May 2032 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1968546448}}
<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 02:27, 19 May 2032 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1968546448}}
The block notice and log entry for this user isn't too informative, but if anyone wishes to view the discussion which lead to this user being indefinitely blocked, it can be found at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#JGabbard spreading white genocide conspiracy theory on South African farm attacks article]]. They were not actually [[WP:banned|banned]], and some editors expressed hope that they would learn, do some self-reflection and reconsider some of their unacceptable views. Even so, some of those editors did still consider that an indefinite block was in order, but not a full siteban. Consensus seemed to be for an indefinite block, not so much an outright ban, but that is just my assessment of it, please read it yourself, as my assessment may not be the same as others. I'm noarchiving this to pin it, as it is going to be of interest to anyone trying to view this page. If the user doesn't want this here, they are welcome to remove it. [[User:Mako001|Mako001]][[Special:Contributions/Mako001|&nbsp;(C)&nbsp;]][[User talk:Mako001|&nbsp;(T)&nbsp;]] 🇺🇦 02:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The block notice and log entry for this user isn't too informative, but if anyone wishes to view the discussion which led to this user being indefinitely blocked, it can be found at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#JGabbard spreading white genocide conspiracy theory on South African farm attacks article]]. They were not actually [[WP:banned|banned]], and some editors expressed hope that they would learn, do some self-reflection and reconsider some of their unacceptable views. Even so, some of those editors did still consider that an indefinite block was in order, but not a full siteban. Consensus seemed to be for an indefinite block, not so much an outright ban, but that is just my assessment of it, please read it yourself, as my assessment may not be the same as others. I'm noarchiving this to pin it, as it is going to be of interest to anyone trying to view this page. If the user doesn't want this here, they are welcome to remove it. [[User:Mako001|Mako001]][[Special:Contributions/Mako001|&nbsp;(C)&nbsp;]][[User talk:Mako001|&nbsp;(T)&nbsp;]] 🇺🇦 02:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)


== Contested deletion ==
== Contested deletion ==

Revision as of 00:30, 30 August 2024

A page you started (You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart), JGabbard!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for writing the article about "You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart)" by Dionne Warwick. I'm a big fan of her work in the 60s with Burt Bacharach and Hal David.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.


A page you started (Jelly Jungle (of Orange Marmalade)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jelly Jungle (of Orange Marmalade), JGabbard!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Is this where Tangerine Dream got their name??

That's an intriguing thought, but it looks like T.D. predates the song by a year or so.

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Supplement to block notice

The block notice and log entry for this user isn't too informative, but if anyone wishes to view the discussion which led to this user being indefinitely blocked, it can be found at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1096#JGabbard spreading white genocide conspiracy theory on South African farm attacks article. They were not actually banned, and some editors expressed hope that they would learn, do some self-reflection and reconsider some of their unacceptable views. Even so, some of those editors did still consider that an indefinite block was in order, but not a full siteban. Consensus seemed to be for an indefinite block, not so much an outright ban, but that is just my assessment of it, please read it yourself, as my assessment may not be the same as others. I'm noarchiving this to pin it, as it is going to be of interest to anyone trying to view this page. If the user doesn't want this here, they are welcome to remove it. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I may elect to appeal the current block at some point in the future. --JGabbard (talk) 00:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]