Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rupert Sheldrake on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 COVID-19 protests in China on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1Day Sooner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 03:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhinyTheYounger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tom (LT) (talk) 03:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump photo op at St. John's Church on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:California cities and mayors of 100,000 population on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Turkey on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Muhammad of Ghor on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Matt Daniels White House press conference 2006.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of prime ministers of New Zealand on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shaun King on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Little has been done to improve the article since the last time it was declined.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1Day Sooner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 11:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @InterstellarGamer12321 — thanks for the review. To be honest, little was done because I believe the original submission was in error; see the SigCov table I wrote up. Unfortunately, the editor who declined went inactive shortly after doing so, so I wasn't able to discuss with him. If you disagree with the SigCov table, I'd be happy to discuss more, but as it stands, I'm very confident that it meets GNG requirements. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 17:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article needs a cleanup. There are references with sigcov, but I assumed that there were issues with them because the last editor declined the draft. He had not left a specific comment, so his reasons were open to interpretation. Proofread the article, making sure to cite the reliable references but not cause WP:REFBOMBING. Once you have proofread it and resubmitted it I will accept the article. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. I've made changes; Special:Diff/1140572190. I will say that 1Day in general received a lot of media coverage, which is why there are a lot of refs, but point taken re: the potential for refbombing. I suspect that there might have been confusion by the original reviewer based on a Ctrl + F search in a spotcheck of some of the articles — people variously wrote about "1Day Sooner", "OneDaySooner", "1 Day Sooner", etc.

I've removed a few single-instance citations. In the case of the survey article, where I cited a peer-reviewed PLOS ONE paper that included 1Day Sooner members, I also include citation to independent, significant coverage of the paper in Vox, which names 1Day Sooner and highlights the same two points made (re: altruism and potential exploitation) in the draft article. My goal was to make sure I wasn't just relying on possibly primary coverage to push what we wanted to be publicized out of that study. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 18:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@InterstellarGamer12321: Went ahead and resubmitted Draft:1Day Sooner — thanks again for the feedback. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 20:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have accepted the draft and it is now a proper article. Sorry for the delay. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1Day Sooner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 08:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Appeal of Wikipedia Image deletion. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 17:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]