Saffronisation or saffronization is the right-wing policy approach in India that seeks to implement a Hindu nationalist agenda, for example onto school textbooks.^[1] Critics have used this political neologism.^[2]

Saffron is considered a sacred color in Hinduism, in which it is associated with the renunciation of worldly desire, purity, and devotion.^[3] Saffron is widely seen as a representative of Hinduism and other Indian religions. However in current times it has been extensively and almost solely used as a political symbol by the Hindutva movement .^[4]

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has said that several Indian history textbooks had overt Marxist or Eurocentric political overtones.^[5] The BJP has had trouble changing the textbooks, because many states in which the BJP is not in power have blocked saffronisation efforts. The BJP, citing a rigid anti-Hindu agenda, restructured NCERT and the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) to make textbooks conform to the BJP's Hindu nationalist platform.^[6] In states where the BJP had control of local government, textbooks were changed extensively to favor a Hindu nationalist narrative.^[7] These changes included the omission of caste-based exclusion and violence throughout Indian history, and the exclusion or minimization of contributions to Indian society made by Muslims.^[2]

Efforts were undertaken in 2004 to reverse the saffronisation of textbooks previously made by BJP, spearheaded by the Indian National Congress,^[8] India's second biggest political party and the BJP's main rival.

When the Hindustan Times reviewed the issue of saffronisation of Indian textbooks in late 2014, it noted that right-wing efforts to change how textbooks recount history faced "some difficulty as it lacks credible historians to back its claims."^[9] The medieval period in India is one such hotly-contested epoch among historians. Since there can be no true consensus about that era due to divided and deeply entrenched political motivations, history for that period is highly subjective and particularly vulnerable to the influence of the textbook writer's sympathies and outlook. "The choice of the textbook writer is more decisive than anything else," it was noted in a report in The Hindu.^[10] Critics have said that the changes to the textbooks have portrayed the medieval period as "a dark age of Islamic colonial rule which snuffed out the glories of the Hindu and Buddhist empires that preceded it".^[8] Another trap in the politicisation of history relates to contention over the state of Jammu and Kashmir.^[10]

By mid-2015, The Times of India reported that the National Council of Educational Research and Training, which is in charge of publishing textbooks, had participated in a meeting convened by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, and during that meeting, the issue of changing textbooks was discussed. An official from the ICHR complained that the theme of nationalism did not receive proper treatment in textbooks, setting the stage for possible textbook revisions.^[7]

The state government of Rajasthan reportedly spent Rs 37 crore to reprint 36 textbooks used for classes 1 to 8 for the 2016–2017 academic session that will be based on an agenda that would promote Indian culture by including historical figures, such as Maharaja Surajmal, Hem Chandra, and Guru Gobind Singh. The textbooks that had been approved up to the 2012–13 academic session were rendered obsolete under the rewriting of history, and those books were auctioned off. In total, 5,66 crore new textbooks were ordered printed for an agenda that critics described was intent on supporting the saffronisation of textbooks. Rajasthan (primary and secondary) education minister Vasudev Devnani denied the charge of saffronisation, but educationists described his decision as the "Hinduisation of education" that occurs when right-wing forces come to power.^[11]

The state government of Karnataka has reportedly ordered new textbooks for the 2017–18 academic session in an effort that academicians and critics have described as a "blatant attempt to saffronise textbooks".^[12]

Saffronisation has also been attempted to portray Mahatma Gandhi's Hindu-nationalist Nathuram Godse in a heroic manner,^[13][14] as well as other Hindutva leaders like Vinayak Damodar Savarkar,^[15][16] and M. S. Golwalkar.

Some major changes include the removal of chapters dealing with Islam and its origins, as well as cutting down content about Mughal dynasty rule in India. Recent changes involve replacement of the name Babri Masjid with "a 3-dome structure" and removal of discussions about Ram Rath Yatra, secular debates about the demolition, and consequences of said demolition. This has led to a polarized perspective.

• Communalism (South Asia)
• Saffron terror
• Indian Knowledge Systems

• Bénéï, Véronique (2005). Manufacturing Citizenship: education and nationalism in Europe, South Asia and China. Routledge. pp. 156–159. ISBN 0-415-36488-4.
• Ninan, Ann (February 2000). "India: Righting or rewriting Hindu history". Inter Press Service. Archived from the original on 16 May 2006.
• Upadhyay, Ray (21 August 2001). "The Politics of Education in India". South Asia Analysis Group. Archived from the original on 17 December 2005.
• Bhatt, Chetan & Mukta, Parita (2000). "Hindutva in the West: mapping the antinomies of diaspora nationalism". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 23 (3): 407–441. doi:10.1080/014198700328935. S2CID 143287533.
• Biswas, Titas (2020). "Pedagogical Curricula and Educational Media: The Malignancy of Saffronised Otherisation in India". Zoon Politikon (11/2020): 146–199.