Eisspeedway

Arctic methane emissions

Main sources of global methane emissions (2008-2017):[1] Contributions from the Arctic are part of the fifth column called other natural emissions.

Arctic methane emissions contribute to a rise in methane concentrations in the atmosphere. Whilst the Arctic region is one of many natural sources of the greenhouse gas methane, there is nowadays also a human component to this due to the effects of climate change.[2] In the Arctic, the main human-influenced sources of methane are thawing permafrost, Arctic sea ice melting, clathrate breakdown and Greenland ice sheet melting. This methane release results in a positive climate change feedback (meaning one that amplifies warming), as methane is a powerful greenhouse gas.[3] When permafrost thaws due to global warming, large amounts of organic material can become available for methanogenesis and may therefore be released as methane.[4]

Since around 2018, there has been consistent increases in global levels of methane in the atmosphere, with the 2020 increase of 15.06 parts per billion breaking the previous record increase of 14.05 ppb set in 1991, and 2021 setting an even larger increase of 18.34 ppb.[5] However, there is currently no evidence connecting the Arctic to this recent acceleration.[6] In fact, a 2021 study indicated that the methane contributions from the Arctic were generally overestimated, while the contributions of tropical regions were underestimated.[7]

Nevertheless, the Arctic's role in global methane trends is considered very likely to increase in the future. There is evidence for increasing methane emissions since 2004 from a Siberian permafrost site into the atmosphere linked to warming.[8]

Mitigation of CO2 emissions by 2050 (i.e. reaching net zero emissions) is probably not enough to stop the future disappearance of summer Arctic Ocean ice cover. Mitigation of methane emissions is also necessary and this has to be carried out over an even shorter period of time.[9] Such mitigation activities need to be carried out in three main sectors: oil and gas, waste and agriculture. Using available measures this could amount to global reductions of ca.180 Mt/yr or about 45% of the current (2021) emissions by 2030.[10]

Observed values and processes

See also: Atmospheric methane and Greenhouse gas emissions
Methane concentrations in Utqiaġvik, Alaska (formerly known as Barrow). A peak methane concentration of 1988 parts per billion was reached in October 2019.[11]
Image showing thawed permafrost resulting in thermokarst, a source of methane released from permafrost.

NOAA annual records for methane concentrations in the atmosphere have been updated since 1984. They show substantial growth during the 1980s, a slowdown in annual growth during the 1990s, a plateau (including some years of declining atmospheric concentrations) in the early 2000s and another consistent increase beginning in 2007. Since around 2018, there has been consistent annual increases in global levels of methane, with the 2020 increase of 15.06 parts per billion breaking the previous record increase of 14.05 ppb set in 1991, and 2021 setting an even larger increase of 18.34 ppb.[5]

Due to the relatively short lifetime of atmospheric methane (7-12 years compared to 100s of years for CO2[12]) its global trends are more complex than those of carbon dioxide.

These trends alarm climate scientists, with some suggesting that they represent a climate change feedback increasing natural methane emissions well beyond their preindustrial levels.[13] However, there is currently no evidence connecting the Arctic to this recent acceleration.[6] In fact, a 2021 study indicated that the role of the Arctic was typically overestimated in global methane accounting, while the role of tropical regions was consistently underestimated.[7] The study suggested that tropical wetland methane emissions were the culprit behind the recent growth trend, and this hypothesis was reinforced by a 2022 paper connecting tropical terrestrial emissions to 80% of the global atmospheric methane trends between 2010 and 2019.[14]

Nevertheless, the Arctic's role in global methane trends is considered very likely to increase in the future. There is evidence for increasing methane emissions since 2004 from a Siberian permafrost site into the atmosphere linked to warming.[8]

Radiocarbon dating of trace methane in lake bubbles and soil organic carbon concluded that 0.2 to 2.5 Pg of permafrost carbon has been released as methane and carbon dioxide over the last 60 years.[15] The 2020 heat wave may have released significant methane from carbonate deposits in Siberian permafrost.[16]

Methane emissions by the permafrost carbon feedback—amplification of surface warming due to enhanced radiative forcing by carbon release from permafrost—could contribute an estimated 205 Gt of carbon emissions, leading up to 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) of additional warming by the end of the 21st century.[17] However, recent research based on the carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric methane trapped in bubbles in Antarctic ice suggests that methane emissions from permafrost and methane hydrates were minor during the last deglaciation, suggesting that future permafrost methane emissions may be lower than previously estimated.[18]

Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic atmosphere measurements

Atmospheric methane concentrations are 8–10% higher in the Arctic than in the Antarctic atmosphere. During cold glacier epochs, this gradient decreases to insignificant levels.[19] Land ecosystems are thought to be the main sources of this asymmetry, although it has been suggested in 2007 that "the role of the Arctic Ocean is significantly underestimated."[20] Soil temperature and moisture levels are important variables in soil methane fluxes in tundra environments.[21][22]

Sources of methane in the Arctic

See also: Methane emissions

Large quantities of methane are stored in the Arctic in natural gas deposits, permafrost, and as undersea clathrates. Permafrost and clathrates degrade on warming,[23] thus large releases of methane from these sources may arise as a result of global warming.[24][25][26] Other sources of methane include submarine taliks, river transport, ice complex retreat, submarine permafrost and decaying gas hydrate deposits.[27] Permafrost contains almost twice as much carbon as the atmosphere,[28] with ~20 Gt of permafrost-associated methane trapped in methane clathrates.[29] Permafrost thaw results in the formation of thermokarst lakes in ice-rich yedoma deposits.[30] Methane frozen in permafrost is slowly released as permafrost thaws.[31]

Thawing permafrost

PMMA chambers used to measure methane and CO2 emissions in Storflaket peat bog near Abisko, northern Sweden.
This section is an excerpt from Permafrost carbon cycle § Methane emissions.[]
Carbon cycle accelerates in the wake of abrupt thaw (orange) relative to the previous state of the area (blue, black).[32]

Global warming in the Arctic accelerates methane release from both existing stores and methanogenesis in rotting biomass.[33] Methanogenesis requires thoroughly anaerobic environments, which slow down the mobilization of old carbon. A 2015 Nature review estimated that the cumulative emissions from thawed anaerobic permafrost sites were 75–85% lower than the cumulative emissions from aerobic sites, and that even there, methane emissions amounted to only 3 to 7% of CO2 emitted in situ (by weight of carbon). While they represented 25 to 45% of the CO2's potential impact on climate over a 100-year timescale, the review concluded that aerobic permafrost thaw still had a greater warming impact overall.[34] In 2018, however, another study in Nature Climate Change performed seven-year incubation experiments and found that methane production became equivalent to CO2 production once a methanogenic microbial community became established at the anaerobic site. This finding had substantially raised the overall warming impact represented by anaerobic thaw sites.[35]

Since methanogenesis requires anaerobic environments, it is frequently associated with Arctic lakes, where the emergence of bubbles of methane can be observed.[36][37] Lakes produced by the thaw of particularly ice-rich permafrost are known as thermokarst lakes. Not all of the methane produced in the sediment of a lake reaches the atmosphere, as it can get oxidized in the water column or even within the sediment itself:[38] However, 2022 observations indicate that at least half of the methane produced within thermokarst lakes reaches the atmosphere.[39] Another process which frequently results in substantial methane emissions is the erosion of permafrost-stabilized hillsides and their ultimate collapse.[40] Altogether, these two processes - hillside collapse (also known as retrogressive thaw slump, or RTS) and thermokarst lake formation - are collectively described as abrupt thaw, as they can rapidly expose substantial volumes of soil to microbial respiration in a matter of days, as opposed to the gradual, cm by cm, thaw of formerly frozen soil which dominates across most permafrost environments. This rapidity was illustrated in 2019, when three permafrost sites which would have been safe from thawing under the "intermediate" Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 for 70 more years had undergone abrupt thaw.[41] Another example occurred in the wake of a 2020 Siberian heatwave, which was found to have increased RTS numbers 17-fold across the northern Taymyr Peninsula – from 82 to 1404, while the resultant soil carbon mobilization increased 28-fold, to an average of 11 grams of carbon per square meter per year across the peninsula (with a range between 5 and 38 grams).[32]

Until recently, Permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) modeling had mainly focused on gradual permafrost thaw, due to the difficulty of modelling abrupt thaw, and because of the flawed assumptions about the rates of methane production.[42] Nevertheless, a study from 2018, by using field observations, radiocarbon dating, and remote sensing to account for thermokarst lakes, determined that abrupt thaw will more than double permafrost carbon emissions by 2100.[43] And a second study from 2020, showed that under the scenario of continually accelerating emissions (RCP 8.5), abrupt thaw carbon emissions across 2.5 million km2 are projected to provide the same feedback as gradual thaw of near-surface permafrost across the whole 18 million km2 it occupies.[42] Thus, abrupt thaw adds between 60 and 100 gigatonnes of carbon by 2300,[44] increasing carbon emissions by ~125–190% when compared to gradual thaw alone.[42][43]

Methane emissions from thawed permafrost appear to decrease as bog matures over time.[45]
However, there is still scientific debate about the rate and the trajectory of methane production in the thawed permafrost environments. For instance, a 2017 paper suggested that even in the thawing peatlands with frequent thermokarst lakes, less than 10% of methane emissions can be attributed to the old, thawed carbon, and the rest is anaerobic decomposition of modern carbon.[46] A follow-up study in 2018 had even suggested that increased uptake of carbon due to rapid peat formation in the thermokarst wetlands would compensate for the increased methane release.[47] Another 2018 paper suggested that permafrost emissions are limited following thermokarst thaw, but are substantially greater in the aftermath of wildfires.[48] In 2022, a paper demonstrated that peatland methane emissions from permafrost thaw are initially quite high (82 milligrams of methane per square meter per day), but decline by nearly three times as the permafrost bog matures, suggesting a reduction in methane emissions in several decades to a century following abrupt thaw.[45]

Arctic sea ice melting

This section is an excerpt from Arctic sea ice decline § Atmospheric chemistry.[]

A 2015 study concluded that Arctic sea ice decline accelerates methane emissions from the Arctic tundra, with the emissions for 2005-2010 being around 1.7 million tonnes higher than they would have been with the sea ice at 1981–1990 levels.[49] One of the researchers noted, "The expectation is that with further sea ice decline, temperatures in the Arctic will continue to rise, and so will methane emissions from northern wetlands."[50]

Cracks in Arctic sea ice expose the seawater to the air, causing mercury in the air to be absorbed into the water. This absorption leads to more mercury, a toxin, entering the food chain where it can negatively affect fish and the animals and people who consume them.[51][52] Mercury is part of Earth's atmosphere due to natural causes (see mercury cycle) and due to human emissions.[53][54]

Clathrate breakdown

This section is an excerpt from Clathrate gun hypothesis.[]
Methane clathrate is released as gas into the surrounding water column or soils when ambient temperature increases
The clathrate gun hypothesis is a proposed explanation for the periods of rapid warming during the Quaternary. The hypothesis is that changes in fluxes in upper intermediate waters in the ocean caused temperature fluctuations that alternately accumulated and occasionally released methane clathrate on upper continental slopes. This would have had an immediate impact on the global temperature, as methane is a much more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Despite its atmospheric lifetime of around 12 years, methane's global warming potential is 72 times greater than that of carbon dioxide over 20 years, and 25 times over 100 years (33 when accounting for aerosol interactions).[55] It is further proposed that these warming events caused the Bond Cycles and individual interstadial events, such as the Dansgaard–Oeschger interstadials.[56]
This section is an excerpt from Clathrate gun hypothesis § Current outlook.[]
In 2018, a perspective piece devoted to tipping points in the climate system suggested that the climate change contribution from methane hydrates would be "negligible" by the end of the century, but could amount to 0.4–0.5 °C (0.72–0.90 °F) on the millennial timescales.[57] In 2021, the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report no longer included methane hydrates in the list of potential tipping points, and says that "it is very unlikely that CH4 emissions from clathrates will substantially warm the climate system over the next few centuries."[58] The report had also linked terrestrial hydrate deposits to gas emission craters discovered in the Yamal Peninsula in Siberia, Russia beginning in July 2014,[59] but noted that since terrestrial gas hydrates predominantly form at a depth below 200 meters, a substantial response within the next few centuries can be ruled out.[58] Likewise, a 2022 assessment of tipping points described methane hydrates as a "threshold-free feedback" rather than a tipping point.[60][61]

Greenland ice sheet melting

See also: Greenland ice sheet § Recent melting

A 2014 study found evidence for methane cycling below the ice sheet of the Russell Glacier, based on subglacial drainage samples which were dominated by Pseudomonadota bacteria. During the study, the most widespread surface melt on record for the past 120 years was observed in Greenland; on 12 July 2012, unfrozen water was present on almost the entire ice sheet surface (98.6%). The findings indicate that methanotrophs could serve as a biological methane sink in the subglacial ecosystem, and the region was, at least during the sample time, a source of atmospheric methane. Scaled dissolved methane flux during the four months of the summer melt season for the Russell Glacier catchment area (1200 km2) was estimated at 990 tonnes CH4. Because this catchment area is representative of similar Greenland outlet glaciers, the researchers concluded that the Greenland Ice Sheet may represent a significant global methane source.[62]

A study in 2016 concluded that methane clathrates may exist below Greenland's and Antarctica's ice sheets, based on past evidence.[63]

Reducing methane emissions

See also: Climate change mitigation

More than half of global methane emissions originate from human activities across three main sectors: fossil fuels (35% of human-caused emissions), waste (20%), and agriculture (40%).[10] Within the fossil fuel sector, oil and gas extraction, processing, and distribution contribute 23%, while coal mining accounts for 12% of these emissions. In the waste sector, landfills and wastewater comprise about 20% of global anthropogenic emissions. In agriculture, livestock emissions from manure and enteric fermentation make up roughly 32%, and rice cultivation contributes 8% of global anthropogenic emissions. Mitigation using available measures could reduce these methane emissions by about 180 Mt/yr or about 45% by 2030.[10]

Mitigation of CO2 emissions by 2050 (i.e. reaching net zero emissions) is probably not enough to stop the future disappearance of summer Arctic Ocean ice cover. Mitigation of methane emissions is also necessary and this has to be carried out over an even shorter period of time.[9]

Flaring methane from oil and gas operations

ARPA-E has funded a research project from 2021-2023 to develop a "smart micro-flare fleet" to burn off methane emissions at remote locations.[64][65][66]

A 2012 review article stated that most existing technologies "operate on confined gas streams of 0.1% methane", and were most suitable for areas where methane is emitted in pockets.[67]

If Arctic oil and gas operations use Best Available Technology (BAT) and Best Environmental Practices (BEP) in petroleum gas flaring, this can result in significant methane emissions reductions, according to the Arctic Council.[68]

See also

References

  1. ^ Saunois, M.; Stavert, A.R.; Poulter, B.; et al. (July 15, 2020). "The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017". Earth System Science Data (ESSD). 12 (3): 1561–1623. Bibcode:2020ESSD...12.1561S. doi:10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020. hdl:1721.1/124698. ISSN 1866-3508. Retrieved 28 August 2020.
  2. ^ Bloom, A. A.; Palmer, P. I.; Fraser, A.; Reay, D. S.; Frankenberg, C. (2010). "Large-Scale Controls of Methanogenesis Inferred from Methane and Gravity Spaceborne Data" (PDF). Science. 327 (5963): 322–325. Bibcode:2010Sci...327..322B. doi:10.1126/science.1175176. PMID 20075250. S2CID 28268515.
  3. ^ Cheng, Chin-Hsien; Redfern, Simon A. T. (23 June 2022). "Impact of interannual and multidecadal trends on methane-climate feedbacks and sensitivity". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 3592. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.3592C. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31345-w. PMC 9226131. PMID 35739128.
  4. ^ Zimov, Sa; Schuur, Ea; Chapin, Fs 3Rd (Jun 2006). "Climate change. Permafrost and the global carbon budget". Science. 312 (5780): 1612–3. doi:10.1126/science.1128908. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16778046. S2CID 129667039.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ a b "Trends in Atmospheric Methane". NOAA. Retrieved 14 October 2022.
  6. ^ a b Jackson RB, Saunois M, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, Poulter B, Stavert AR, Bergamaschi P, Niwa Y, Segers A, Tsuruta A (15 July 2020). "Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources". Environmental Research Letters. 15 (7): 071002. Bibcode:2020ERL....15g1002J. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab9ed2.
  7. ^ a b Lan X, Basu S, Schwietzke S, Bruhwiler LM, Dlugokencky EJ, Michel SE, Sherwood OA, Tans PP, Thoning K, Etiope G, Zhuang Q, Liu L, Oh Y, Miller JB, Pétron G, Vaughn BH, Crippa M (8 May 2021). "Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks Using δ13C-CH4". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 35 (6): e2021GB007000. Bibcode:2021GBioC..3507000L. doi:10.1029/2021GB007000. PMC 8244052. PMID 34219915.
  8. ^ a b Rößger, Norman; Sachs, Torsten; Wille, Christian; Boike, Julia; Kutzbach, Lars (27 October 2022). "Seasonal increase of methane emissions linked to warming in Siberian tundra". Nature Climate Change. 12 (11): 1031–1036. Bibcode:2022NatCC..12.1031R. doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01512-4. S2CID 253192613. Retrieved 21 January 2023.
  9. ^ a b Sun, Tianyi; Ocko, Ilissa B; Hamburg, Steven P (2022-03-15). "The value of early methane mitigation in preserving Arctic summer sea ice". Environmental Research Letters. 17 (4): 044001. Bibcode:2022ERL....17d4001S. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4f10. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 247472086.
  10. ^ a b c United Nations Environment Programme and Climate and Clean Air Coalition (2021). Global Methane Assessment: Benefits and Costs of Mitigating Methane Emissions. Nairobi: Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. ISBN 9789280738544.
  11. ^ US Department of Commerce, NOAA. "Global Monitoring Laboratory - Data Visualization". gml.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2024-08-22.
  12. ^ "Methane | Vital Signs". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved 2024-07-20.
  13. ^ Tollefson J (8 February 2022). "Scientists raise alarm over 'dangerously fast' growth in atmospheric methane". Nature. Retrieved 14 October 2022.
  14. ^ Feng, Liang; Palmer, Paul I.; Zhu, Sihong; Parker, Robert J.; Liu, Yi (16 March 2022). "Tropical methane emissions explain large fraction of recent changes in global atmospheric methane growth rate". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 1378. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.1378F. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28989-z. PMC 8927109. PMID 35297408.
  15. ^ Walter Anthony, Katey; Daanen, Ronald; Anthony, Peter; Schneider von Deimling, Thomas; Ping, Chien-Lu; Chanton, Jeffrey P.; Grosse, Guido (2016). "Methane emissions proportional to permafrost carbon thawed in Arctic lakes since the 1950s". Nature Geoscience. 9 (9): 679–682. Bibcode:2016NatGe...9..679W. doi:10.1038/ngeo2795. ISSN 1752-0908. OSTI 1776496.
  16. ^ Froitzheim, Nikolaus; Majka, Jaroslaw; Zastrozhnov, Dmitry (2021). "Methane release from carbonate rock formations in the Siberian permafrost area during and after the 2020 heat wave". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (32). Bibcode:2021PNAS..11807632F. doi:10.1073/pnas.2107632118. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 8364203. PMID 34341110.
  17. ^ Schuur, E. a. G.; McGuire, A. D.; Schädel, C.; Grosse, G.; Harden, J. W.; Hayes, D. J.; Hugelius, G.; Koven, C. D.; Kuhry, P.; Lawrence, D. M.; Natali, S. M. (2015). "Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback". Nature. 520 (7546): 171–179. Bibcode:2015Natur.520..171S. doi:10.1038/nature14338. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 25855454. S2CID 4460926.
  18. ^ Dyonisius, M. N.; Petrenko, V. V.; Smith, A. M.; Hua, Q.; Yang, B.; Schmitt, J.; Beck, J.; Seth, B.; Bock, M.; Hmiel, B.; Vimont, I. (2020-02-21). "Old carbon reservoirs were not important in the deglacial methane budget". Science. 367 (6480): 907–910. Bibcode:2020Sci...367..907D. doi:10.1126/science.aax0504. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 32079770. S2CID 211230350.
  19. ^ IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C.A. Johnson (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 881pp.
  20. ^ N. E. Shakhova; I. P. Semiletov; A. N. Salyuk; N. N. Bel'cheva; D. A. Kosmach (2007). "Methane Anomalies in the Near-Water Atmospheric Layer above the Shelf of East Siberian Arctic Shelf". Doklady Earth Sciences. 415 (5): 764–768. Bibcode:2007DokES.415..764S. doi:10.1134/S1028334X07050236. S2CID 129047326.
  21. ^ Torn, Margaret Susan; Chapin, F.Stuart (1993). "Environmental and biotic controls over methane flux from Arctic tundra". Chemosphere. 26 (1–4): 357–368. Bibcode:1993Chmsp..26..357T. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(93)90431-4.
  22. ^ Whalen, S. C.; Reeburgh, W. S. (1990). "Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soils". Nature. 346 (6280): 160–162. Bibcode:1990Natur.346..160W. doi:10.1038/346160a0. S2CID 4312042. Archived from the original on 2019-07-24. Retrieved 2019-06-28.
  23. ^ Carrington, Damian (July 21, 2020). "First active leak of sea-bed methane discovered in Antarctica". The Guardian.
  24. ^ Zimov, Sa; Schuur, Ea; Chapin, Fs 3Rd (June 2006). "Climate change. Permafrost and the global carbon budget". Science. 312 (5780): 1612–3. doi:10.1126/science.1128908. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16778046. S2CID 129667039.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ Shakhova, Natalia (2005). "The distribution of methane on the Siberian Arctic shelves: Implications for the marine methane cycle". Geophysical Research Letters. 32 (9): L09601. Bibcode:2005GeoRL..32.9601S. doi:10.1029/2005GL022751.
  26. ^ "Scientists shocked by Arctic permafrost thawing 70 years sooner than predicted". The Guardian. Reuters. June 18, 2019. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-07-14.
  27. ^ Shakhova, Natalia; Semiletov, Igor (2007). "Methane release and coastal environment in the East Siberian Arctic shelf". Journal of Marine Systems. 66 (1–4): 227–243. Bibcode:2007JMS....66..227S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.371.4677. doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.06.006.
  28. ^ Brouillette, Monique (2021). "How microbes in permafrost could trigger a massive carbon bomb". Nature. 591 (7850): 360–362. Bibcode:2021Natur.591..360B. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00659-y. PMID 33731951. S2CID 232297719.
  29. ^ Ruppel, C. (2014). "Permafrost-Associated Gas Hydrate: Is It Really Approximately 1 % of the Global System?". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 60 (2): 429–436. doi:10.1021/je500770m. ISSN 0021-9568.
  30. ^ Zandt, Michiel H.; Liebner, Susanne; Welte, Cornelia U. (2020). "Roles of Thermokarst Lakes in a Warming World". Trends in Microbiology. 28 (9): 769–779. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2020.04.002. hdl:2066/222234. ISSN 0966-842X. PMID 32362540. S2CID 218492291.
  31. ^ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers", Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  32. ^ a b Bernhard, Philipp; Zwieback, Simon; Hajnsek, Irena (2 May 2022). "Accelerated mobilization of organic carbon from retrogressive thaw slumps on the northern Taymyr Peninsula". The Cryosphere. 16 (7): 2819–2835. Bibcode:2022TCry...16.2819B. doi:10.5194/tc-16-2819-2022.
  33. ^ Walter, K. M.; Chanton, J. P.; Chapin, F. S.; Schuur, E. A. G.; Zimov, S. A. (2008). "Methane production and bubble emissions from arctic lakes: Isotopic implications for source pathways and ages". Journal of Geophysical Research. 113 (G3): G00A08. Bibcode:2008JGRG..113.0A08W. doi:10.1029/2007JG000569.
  34. ^ Schuur, E. A. G.; McGuire, A. D.; Schädel, C.; Grosse, G.; Harden, J. W.; et al. (9 April 2015). "Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback". Nature. 520 (7546): 171–179. Bibcode:2015Natur.520..171S. doi:10.1038/nature14338. hdl:1874/330256. PMID 25855454. S2CID 4460926.
  35. ^ Pfeiffer, Eva-Maria; Grigoriev, Mikhail N.; Liebner, Susanne; Beer, Christian; Knoblauch, Christian (April 2018). "Methane production as key to the greenhouse gas budget of thawing permafrost". Nature Climate Change. 8 (4): 309–312. Bibcode:2018NatCC...8..309K. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0095-z. ISSN 1758-6798. S2CID 90764924.
  36. ^ Walter, KM; Zimov, SA; Chanton, JP; Verbyla, D; et al. (7 September 2006). "Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming". Nature. 443 (7107): 71–75. Bibcode:2006Natur.443...71W. doi:10.1038/nature05040. PMID 16957728. S2CID 4415304.
  37. ^ Gillis, Justin (December 16, 2011). "As Permafrost Thaws, Scientists Study the Risks". The New York Times. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  38. ^ Vigderovich, Hanni; Eckert, Werner; Elul, Michal; Rubin-Blum, Maxim; Elvert, Marcus; Sivan, Orit; Czimczik, C. I. (2 May 2022). "Long-term incubations provide insight into the mechanisms of anaerobic oxidation of methane in methanogenic lake sediments". Biogeosciences. 19 (8). Bibcode:2022GeoRL..4997347P. doi:10.1029/2021GL097347. S2CID 247491567.
  39. ^ Pellerin, André; Lotem, Noam; Anthony, Katey Walter; Russak, Efrat Eliani; Hasson, Nicholas; Røy, Hans; Chanton, Jeffrey P.; Sivan, Orit (4 March 2022). "Methane production controls in a young thermokarst lake formed by abrupt permafrost thaw". Global Change Biology. 28 (10): 3206–3221. doi:10.1111/gcb.16151. PMC 9310722. PMID 35243729.
  40. ^ Turetsky, Merritt R. (2019-04-30). "Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release". Nature. 569 (7754): 32–34. Bibcode:2019Natur.569...32T. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01313-4. PMID 31040419.
  41. ^ "Scientists shocked by Arctic permafrost thawing 70 years sooner than predicted". The Guardian. 2019-06-18. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-07-02.
  42. ^ a b c Turetsky, Merritt R.; Abbott, Benjamin W.; Jones, Miriam C.; Anthony, Katey Walter; Olefeldt, David; Schuur, Edward A. G.; Grosse, Guido; Kuhry, Peter; Hugelius, Gustaf; Koven, Charles; Lawrence, David M. (February 2020). "Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw". Nature Geoscience. 13 (2): 138–143. Bibcode:2020NatGe..13..138T. doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0526-0. ISSN 1752-0894. S2CID 213348269.
  43. ^ a b Walter Anthony, Katey; Schneider von Deimling, Thomas; Nitze, Ingmar; Frolking, Steve; Emond, Abraham; Daanen, Ronald; Anthony, Peter; Lindgren, Prajna; Jones, Benjamin; Grosse, Guido (2018-08-15). "21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 3262. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3262W. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05738-9. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 6093858. PMID 30111815.
  44. ^ Turetsky MR, Abbott BW, Jones MC, Anthony KW, Olefeldt D, Schuur EA, Koven C, McGuire AD, Grosse G, Kuhry P, Hugelius G (May 2019). "Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release". Nature. 569 (7754): 32–34. Bibcode:2019Natur.569...32T. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01313-4. PMID 31040419.
  45. ^ a b Heffernan, Liam; Cavaco, Maria A.; Bhatia, Maya P.; Estop-Aragonés, Cristian; Knorr, Klaus-Holger; Olefeldt, David (24 June 2022). "High peatland methane emissions following permafrost thaw: enhanced acetoclastic methanogenesis during early successional stages". Biogeosciences. 19 (8): 3051–3071. Bibcode:2022BGeo...19.3051H. doi:10.5194/bg-19-3051-2022.
  46. ^ Cooper, M.; Estop-Aragonés, C.; Fisher, J.; et al. (26 June 2017). "Limited contribution of permafrost carbon to methane release from thawing peatlands". Nature Climate Change. 7 (7): 507–511. Bibcode:2017NatCC...7..507C. doi:10.1038/nclimate3328.
  47. ^ Estop-Aragonés, Cristian; Cooper, Mark D.A.; Fisher, James P.; et al. (March 2018). "Limited release of previously-frozen C and increased new peat formation after thaw in permafrost peatlands". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 118: 115–129. Bibcode:2018SBiBi.118..115E. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.010.
  48. ^ Estop-Aragonés, Cristian; et al. (13 August 2018). "Respiration of aged soil carbon during fall in permafrost peatlands enhanced by active layer deepening following wildfire but limited following thermokarst". Environmental Research Letters. 13 (8): 085002. Bibcode:2018ERL....13h5002E. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aad5f0. S2CID 158857491.
  49. ^ Parmentier, Frans-Jan W.; Zhang, Wenxin; Mi, Yanjiao; Zhu, Xudong; van Huissteden, Jacobus; J. Hayes, Daniel; Zhuang, Qianlai; Christensen, Torben R.; McGuire, A. David (25 July 2015). "Rising methane emissions from northern wetlands associated with sea ice decline". Geophysical Research Letters. 42 (17): 7214–7222. Bibcode:2015GeoRL..42.7214P. doi:10.1002/2015GL065013. PMC 5014133. PMID 27667870.
  50. ^ "Melting Arctic sea ice accelerates methane emissions". ScienceDaily. 2015. Archived from the original on 2019-06-08. Retrieved 2018-03-09.
  51. ^ Christopher W. Moore; Daniel Obrist; Alexandra Steffen; Ralf M. Staebler; Thomas A. Douglas; Andreas Richter; Son V. Nghiem (January 2014). "Convective forcing of mercury and ozone in the Arctic boundary layer induced by leads in sea ice". Nature Letters. 506 (7486): 81–84. Bibcode:2014Natur.506...81M. doi:10.1038/nature12924. PMID 24429521. S2CID 1431542.
  52. ^ Rasmussen, Carol (15 January 2014). "Cracked sea ice stirs up Arctic mercury concern". ScienceDaily. NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
  53. ^ "Human emissions increased mercury in the atmosphere sevenfold". seas.harvard.edu. November 1, 2023. Retrieved 2024-08-23.
  54. ^ Pirrone, N.; Cinnirella, S.; Feng, X.; Finkelman, R. B.; Friedli, H. R.; Leaner, J.; Mason, R.; Mukherjee, A. B.; Stracher, G. B.; Streets, D. G.; Telmer, K. (2010-07-02). "Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 10 (13): 5951–5964. Bibcode:2010ACP....10.5951P. doi:10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010. ISSN 1680-7324.
  55. ^ Shindell, Drew T.; Faluvegi, Greg; Koch, Dorothy M.; Schmidt, Gavin A.; Unger, Nadine; Bauer, Susanne E. (2009). "Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions". Science. 326 (5953): 716–718. Bibcode:2009Sci...326..716S. doi:10.1126/science.1174760. PMID 19900930. S2CID 30881469.
  56. ^ Kennett, James P.; Cannariato, Kevin G.; Hendy, Ingrid L.; Behl, Richard J. (2003). Methane Hydrates in Quaternary Climate Change: The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union. doi:10.1029/054SP. ISBN 978-0-87590-296-8.
  57. ^ Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Scheffer, Marten; Lade, Steven J.; Fetzer, Ingo; Donges, Jonathan F.; Crucifix, Michel; Cornell, Sarah E.; Barnosky, Anthony D. (2018). "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (33): 8252–8259. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.8252S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6099852. PMID 30082409.
  58. ^ a b Fox-Kemper, B.; Hewitt, H.T.; Xiao, C.; Aðalgeirsdóttir, G.; Drijfhout, S.S.; Edwards, T.L.; Golledge, N.R.; Hemer, M.; Kopp, R.E.; Krinner, G.; Mix, A. (2021). Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; Pirani, A.; Connors, S.L.; Péan, C.; Berger, S.; Caud, N.; Chen, Y.; Goldfarb, L. (eds.). "Chapter 5: Global Carbon and other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks" (PDF). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: 5. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.011.
  59. ^ Moskvitch, Katia (2014). "Mysterious Siberian crater attributed to methane". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15649. S2CID 131534214. Archived from the original on 2014-11-19. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
  60. ^ Armstrong McKay, David; Abrams, Jesse; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Sakschewski, Boris; Loriani, Sina; Fetzer, Ingo; Cornell, Sarah; Rockström, Johan; Staal, Arie; Lenton, Timothy (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points". Science. 377 (6611): eabn7950. doi:10.1126/science.abn7950. hdl:10871/131584. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 36074831. S2CID 252161375.
  61. ^ Armstrong McKay, David (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points – paper explainer". climatetippingpoints.info. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
  62. ^ Markus Dieser; Erik L J E Broemsen; Karen A Cameron; Gary M King; Amanda Achberger; Kyla Choquette; Birgit Hagedorn; Ron Sletten; Karen Junge & Brent C Christner (2014). "Molecular and biogeochemical evidence for methane cycling beneath the western margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet". The ISME Journal. 8 (11): 2305–2316. Bibcode:2014ISMEJ...8.2305D. doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.59. PMC 4992074. PMID 24739624.
  63. ^ Alexey Portnov; Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta; Jürgen Mienert & Alun Hubbard (2016). "Ice-sheet-driven methane storage and release in the Arctic". Nature Communications. 7: 10314. Bibcode:2016NatCo...710314P. doi:10.1038/ncomms10314. PMC 4729839. PMID 26739497.
  64. ^ "Frost Methane Labs: Design of Smart Micro-Flare Fleet to Mitigate Distributed Methane Emissions". ARPA-E. Retrieved 2022-07-24.
  65. ^ Herman, Ari (2019-08-26). "A Startup to Save All Startups: Mitigating Arctic Methane Release". The LegoBox Travelogue. Retrieved 2022-07-24.
  66. ^ "Home". Frost Methane Labs. 2021. Retrieved 2022-07-24.
  67. ^ Stolaroff, Joshuah K.; Bhattacharyya, Subarna; Smith, Clara A.; Bourcier, William L.; Cameron-Smith, Philip J.; Aines, Roger D. (2012-06-19). "Review of Methane Mitigation Technologies with Application to Rapid Release of Methane from the Arctic". Environmental Science & Technology. 46 (12): 6455–6469. Bibcode:2012EnST...46.6455S. doi:10.1021/es204686w. ISSN 0013-936X. OSTI 1773262. PMID 22594483.
  68. ^ "How to reduce emissions of black carbon and methane in the Arctic". Arctic Council. Retrieved 2022-07-24.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_methane_release